Microfluidic Valve Self-Test via Segmented Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In microfluidic devices for chemical and biological applications, there is a need to effectively test and ensure the functionality of micro-mechanical valves within fluid channels, particularly when multiple valves must operate concurrently, as defects can be masked by interdependencies, leading to challenges in identifying blockages or leakages.

Innovation Solution

A device with blockable/un-blockable fluid channels and integrated self-test equipment, featuring a network of fluid channels, valves, and control channels, where pressure applied to control ports allows for the blocking or un-blocking of fluid flows, and self-test mechanisms to detect defects by comparing expected and actual flow patterns, enabling concurrent testing of multiple channels and reducing the risk of masked defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple micro-mechanical valves are integrated into a single device for concurrent operation, then the device functionality and application versatility are improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring valve defects increases due to interdependencies between channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoiddefect detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into two independent subsystems: a first set of fluid channels with valves for actual applications, and a second set of fluid channels with valves for testing. This segmentation allows the testing subsystem to operate independently, eliminating the masking effect of interdependencies between channels and enabling clear detection of individual valve defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A copy of the valve system is created in the second set of fluid channels. The second valves replicate the functionality and control mechanism of the first valves, allowing defects to be detected in the test copy without affecting the actual application channels. The control channels connect both valve sets, enabling the test copy to reveal defects that would be masked in the integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing of all micro-mechanical valves is performed to ensure functionality, then the reliability of fluid flow operations is improved, but the testing time and operational downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow operation reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Valve functionality is tested in advance using the second set of fluid channels before the actual application begins. The control channels allow pressure to be applied to test valves beforehand, ensuring they are functional before being used in the first set of fluid channels for real applications, thus reducing operational downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The device performs self-testing through integrated test equipment and control channels that are part of the device itself. This self-service capability allows comprehensive valve testing to be performed quickly without requiring external testing equipment or complex setup procedures, minimizing testing time while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If test equipment is integrated directly into the microfluidic device, then the device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting easeVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The test equipment is merged with the main device structure, sharing common elements such as control channels, valve mechanisms, and fluid pathways. The second set of fluid channels and test valves are integrated into the same device body as the first set, allowing comprehensive testing functionality to be added without requiring separate external testing equipment, thus maintaining ease of operation while controlling size increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for efficient detection of blockages and leakages in microfluidic devices, ensuring the reliability of fluid flow operations, reducing testing time, and minimizing the device's size while maintaining the ability to visually inspect channel states, thus enhancing the overall performance and reliability of microfluidic systems.

Implementation Method 1

a first control port which allows for blocking or un-blocking a flow through one of the first fluid channels based on a pressure applied to said first valve via said first control port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11921126B2Device with blockable/un-blockable fluid channels and built-in self-test equipment
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAT MUNCHEN
  • US11921126B2 patent drawing
  • US11921126B2 patent drawing
  • US11921126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device includes a plurality of first fluid channels connected to one or more first fluid inlets, a plurality of first valves, each of the first valves having a first control port which allows for blocking or un-blocking a flow through one of the first fluid channels based on a pressure applied to the first valve via the first control port, a plurality of first control channels, each of the first control channels being connected to at least one of the first control ports, and self-test equipment.