Microfluidic Flow Control via Viscosity and Constriction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microfluidic systems face challenges in efficiently controlling fluid flow, which is crucial for chemical and biological processes, as existing methods often require complex setups and external controls, leading to increased costs and sophistication.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of microfluidic systems with flow constriction regions and fluids of varying viscosities, where the cross-sectional area of channels and fluid viscosity are strategically designed to control fluid flow rates without the need for valves or external pressure, allowing for precise control of fluid velocity and residence time in analysis regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If external controls and valves are used to control fluid flow, then flow control precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the fluids' own viscosity properties to control flow rates. Different viscosity fluids automatically regulate flow through the channel network without external valves or controls. The more viscous fluid naturally moves slower, creating self-regulating flow distribution throughout the microfluidic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameter of fluid viscosity to control flow rates. By selecting fluids with different viscosity values, the system achieves precise flow control. The viscosity parameter directly determines flow velocity and residence time in analysis regions, eliminating the need for mechanical flow control devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If external pressure control systems are implemented, then flow rate modulation is improved, but system sophistication and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate modulationVSAvoidsystem sophistication
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates external pressure control mechanisms by using the inherent viscosity differences of the fluids themselves. The flow rate modulation is achieved passively through the viscous properties of the fluids, which naturally create the required flow rate variations without external intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical pressure control systems with a fluid property-based control mechanism. Instead of using pumps, valves, or pressure regulators to modulate flow rates, the system relies on the viscous drag forces inherent to the fluids, substituting mechanical complexity with fluid physical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If channel cross-sectional area is reduced to increase flow rate control, then flow velocity control is improved, but fluid flow efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow velocity controlVSAvoidfluid flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different channel cross-sectional areas at different locations to optimize flow control. The channel geometry is locally adjusted to work in conjunction with fluid viscosity, creating regions of controlled velocity without significantly reducing overall flow efficiency. This localized geometric modification complements the viscosity-based control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient control of fluid flow rates, allowing for prolonged interaction times in analysis regions, reducing the need for external controls and simplifying the systems, thereby enhancing the precision and efficiency of chemical and biological assays.

Implementation Method 1

the viscosity of the first fluid is different than the viscosity of the second fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity:

Implementation Method 2

applying a substantially constant, non-zero pressure drop across an inlet and an outlet of a microfluidic system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

a fluid path defined by the first channel portion has a larger cross-sectional area than a cross-sectional area of a fluid path defined by the second channel portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow constriction:

Data Source

PatentUS10159978B2Flow control in microfluidic systems
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 OPKO DIAGNOSTICS LLC
  • US10159978B2 patent drawing
  • US10159978B2 patent drawing
  • US10159978B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Microfluidic systems and methods including those that provide control of fluid flow are provided. Such systems and methods can be used, for example, to control pressure-driven flow based on the influence of channel geometry and the viscosity of one or more fluids inside the system.