Microglial Cell Morphometry via ML Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods are inadequate for accurately classifying microglial cell states at single-cell resolution, which is crucial for diagnosing disorders and assessing treatment effectiveness in the central nervous system, particularly in conditions like Alzheimer's disease, due to the complexity of morphological phenotypes and heterogeneity in microglial responses.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that classify microglial morphology using machine learning models to segment microglial cells into soma and processes, generate a feature bank, and cluster cells based on morphometric features, allowing for precise determination of cell states and their proportions in biological samples, enabling more accurate diagnosis and treatment assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual classification methods are used to determine microglial cell states, then the process is simple to implement, but the classification accuracy and precision are insufficient due to the complexity of morphological phenotypes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual classification methods with an automated machine learning system that uses image analysis algorithms to classify microglial cell states. The system automatically extracts morphological features from images and applies trained models to determine cell states, eliminating the need for manual inspection while significantly improving classification accuracy and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital representation (feature bank) of microglial cell morphology that can be replicated and analyzed computationally. By capturing morphological features as measurable data points and storing them in a structured feature bank, the system enables repeated, consistent analysis without the variability inherent in manual methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If hundreds of microglial morphological parameters are measured, then more comprehensive cell state information is obtained, but it becomes difficult to identify which parameters are most relevant and increases analysis complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidfeature analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant morphological features from the comprehensive set of hundreds of parameters. The machine learning model identifies and extracts key features that are most predictive of microglial cell states, discarding redundant or less informative parameters. This extraction process maintains information completeness while reducing analysis complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of analysis to different features based on their importance. Critical morphological parameters receive more sophisticated analysis and weighting in the classification algorithm, while less important parameters are analyzed with simpler methods or given lower weights, optimizing the overall analysis process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If microglial cells are classified at individual cell level, then single-cell resolution is achieved, but the accuracy of state determination is reduced due to population level heterogeneity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-cell resolutionVSAvoidstate classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines information from multiple cells to improve classification accuracy. By aggregating feature data across cell populations and using ensemble methods in the machine learning model, the system leverages population-level patterns while maintaining the ability to classify individual cells. This merging approach reduces the impact of heterogeneity and measurement noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If cluster-based classification is used to improve accuracy, then population level heterogeneity is better accounted for, but the process becomes more complex compared to individual cell classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate classification accuracyVSAvoidclassification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification process into distinct stages: individual cell feature extraction, clustering of cells based on morphological similarity, and then state classification of clusters. This segmentation allows the system to benefit from both single-cell resolution and population-level accuracy without requiring a single overly complex classification algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240420490A1Microglial cell morphometry
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 DENALI THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US20240420490A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420490A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420490A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems described herein may allow for the classification of microglial morphology at single cell resolution. Microglial cell states may be determined, and a biological sample from which the microglial cells are obtained may be classified based on the microglial cell states. Classifying microglial cells may involving segmenting microglia cells into soma and processes in immunofluorescence microscopy images. Additionally, a feature bank may be generated. Values of the features in the feature bank may be measured for an image. Cells may be clustered using the values of the features in the feature bank. The cells in a cluster may be compared to a reference cell with a known state and having known morphological properties. The cluster in the cell may then be assigned the same state as a reference cell. The amount of cells having the state may then be used to determine properties of the biological sample.