Microgrid Fault Detection with CNN-GRU and DRL Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fault detection and classification methods in microgrids face challenges such as high computational complexity, inefficiency in handling high-impedance faults, and instability under varying network topologies and noise conditions, particularly in AC microgrids operating in islanded mode.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid model combining a convolutional neural network (CNN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is employed to detect and classify faults, utilizing local measurements and adaptive learning to handle AC microgrid topology changes, bidirectional power flow, and fault current levels, with a focus on fast tripping and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional fault detection methods are used in microgrids, then the protection system can identify faults, but the computational complexity increases and detection accuracy decreases for high-impedance faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fault detection process is segmented into distinct phases: training phase where the CNN-GRU hybrid model learns from labeled fault data, and detection phase where the trained model processes real-time measurements. This segmentation allows complex computations to be performed only during training, while runtime detection becomes computationally efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The CNN-GRU hybrid model is pre-trained offline using comprehensive fault data and simulations before deployment. This preliminary action prepares the model with learned features and patterns, enabling it to perform accurate fault detection during operation without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive protection schemes are implemented to handle topology changes, then the system can adapt to islanded mode operation, but the stability against noise and varying conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopology adaptation capabilityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The CNN-GRU hybrid model acts as an intermediary between raw measurements and protection decisions. It processes and filters the input signals, extracting meaningful features while suppressing noise and disturbances, thereby providing stable and reliable fault detection under varying topological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The model adapts to different operating conditions by learning from diverse training data that includes various topologies, noise levels, and fault scenarios. This parameter variation during training enables the model to maintain stability and accuracy across different microgrid configurations without requiring reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If fast tripping is implemented to improve protection speed, then the operating time decreases, but the accuracy of fault classification and detection reliability worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection operating speedVSAvoidfault detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The CNN-GRU hybrid model is pre-trained offline using comprehensive fault data and simulations before deployment. This preliminary action prepares the model with learned features and patterns, enabling it to perform accurate fault detection during operation without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The protection approach transitions from traditional time-domain analysis to a hybrid spatial-temporal dimension by combining CNN's spatial feature extraction with GRU's temporal sequence processing. This dimensional transformation enables the model to capture both local fault characteristics and temporal evolution patterns, achieving fast and reliable classification simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250271486A1Method for classification and detection of faults of a microgrid and a fault detecting system coupled to microgrid
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS
  • US20250271486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271486A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the classification and detection of faults in a microgrid having a distance relay, includes measuring the first plurality of voltage signals and the first plurality of current signals of the microgrid, calculating a plurality of fault-loop impedance signals, comparing the plurality of fault-loop impedance signals and a plurality of reference impedance values, inputting the plurality of difference values to a convolutional neural network (CNN)-gated recurrent unit (GRU) hybrid model, generating a reference tripping signal, defining a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agent for a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) model. The method further includes processing a second plurality of voltage signals and current signals of microgrid and classifying the one or more fault signals into one or more fault types.