Consensus-Based Microgrid Island Detection for Cybersecure Tripping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for unintentional island detection in microgrids face challenges such as non-detection zones, nuisance tripping, and potential cyber-attacks, which can lead to false positives and compromised system stability.

Innovation Solution

A consensus-based method using multiple UI detection sources with redundancy to identify unintentional islanding, where indications from a threshold number of sources are required to trigger a response, reducing false positives and enhancing cybersecurity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional single-source UI detection methods are used, then the detection response is fast, but the reliability is reduced due to false positives and non-detection zones

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUI detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple UI detection sources (power flow-based, frequency-based, and impedance-based detectors) into a unified detection system that requires consensus from multiple sources before triggering an island event. This merging approach eliminates non-detection zones and reduces false positives by cross-validating detection signals across different measurement principles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where detection signals from multiple sources are continuously monitored and compared against consensus thresholds. The controller receives feedback from each detection source and only triggers UI response when a predefined number of sources agree, creating a self-correcting system that filters out false positives while maintaining fast response to genuine island events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple UI detection sources with consensus requirement are used, then the reliability and resistance to cyber-attacks are improved, but the detection system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity resilienceVSAvoidconsensus-based detection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into independent detection sources, each monitoring different electrical parameters (power flow, frequency, impedance). This segmentation allows the system to distribute the detection function across multiple specialized components, making the overall system more resilient to cyber-attacks while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each UI detection source is designed with specialized local quality, focusing on detecting specific aspects of island conditions through different measurement principles. The power flow detector monitors active/reactive power, the frequency detector tracks frequency deviations, and the impedance detector measures impedance changes, allowing each component to excel at its specific detection task while contributing to overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If a consensus number greater than one is required, then false positives are reduced, but the detection time may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisland detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires a partial consensus (a predefined number of detection sources agreeing) rather than complete unanimity, allowing fast response while maintaining accuracy. This partial action approach balances the need for precision with the requirement for timely response, triggering UI protection when sufficient evidence accumulates without waiting for all possible detection sources to confirm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation by requiring multiple detection sources to agree before triggering the final UI response. This preliminary consensus action filters out false positives early in the detection process, ensuring that only genuine island events proceed to the protection phase, thereby maintaining both accuracy and acceptable response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4287434A1Robust and cybersecure coordinated unintentional island detection for microgrids
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 HITACHI ENERGY USA INC
  • EP4287434A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4287434A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4287434A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Unintentional islanding (UI) of a circuit of distributed energy resources (DERs) may leave area electrical power systems (EPS), external to the DER circuit, energized. Thus, UI detection methods have been developed to detect unintentional islanding and trigger a UI response. However, individual UI detection methods have various deficiencies. Thus, a consensus-based UI detection process is disclosed that builds a consensus from multiple UI detection sources, optionally implementing different UI detection methods. The redundancy in this consensus-based UI detection process provides robust, sensitive, selective, and cybersecure UI detection for the entire DER circuit. For example, the consensus-based UI detection process may eliminate or reduce non-detection zones, avoid false positives, thwart cyber-attacks, and/or the like.