Microlithography Illumination System Beam Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current illumination systems for microlithographic exposure apparatus face challenges in varying the geometry of the illuminated field without incurring substantial light losses, often requiring adjustable field stops that block light and complicate the system layout.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a beam deflecting device with reflective or transparent elements that adjust the deflection angles to form variable light patterns on the optical raster element's facets, allowing for precise control of the illuminated field geometry without the need for a field stop, thereby minimizing light losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If adjustable field stops are used to vary the illuminated field geometry, then the field geometry can be adjusted, but light losses increase and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield geometry adjustmentVSAvoidlight losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the field stop component entirely from the illumination system. Instead of using a field stop to define the illuminated field geometry, the system uses a programmable mirror array that can be controlled to illuminate only the required regions of the optical raster element, thereby eliminating light losses associated with field stops while maintaining geometric adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical field stop system with a programmable mirror array controlled by electronic signals. The mirror array can dynamically adjust which regions of the optical raster element receive light, providing geometric adaptability without the light losses and mechanical complexity of traditional field stops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If adjustable field stops are used to vary the illuminated field geometry, then the field geometry can be adjusted, but the system layout becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield geometry adjustmentVSAvoidsystem layout
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the field stop component entirely from the illumination system. Instead of using a field stop to define the illuminated field geometry, the system uses a programmable mirror array that can be controlled to illuminate only the required regions of the optical raster element, thereby eliminating light losses while maintaining geometric adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The programmable mirror array serves multiple functions: it performs the traditional role of field stops for defining illuminated geometry, while also enabling dynamic reconfiguration of illumination patterns without requiring additional mechanical components. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If conventional illumination systems illuminate the entire optical raster element, then maximum light is utilized, but the illuminated field geometry cannot be varied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight utilizationVSAvoidfield geometry variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic illumination system where the programmable mirror array can change its configuration in real-time. This allows the system to adaptively illuminate only the necessary regions of the optical raster element corresponding to the desired field geometry, providing both high light utilization and geometric variability through dynamic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables flexible variation of the illuminated field geometry with reduced light losses, potentially eliminating the need for a field stop and simplifying the system design, while ensuring sharp edges and consistent intensity across the field.

Implementation Method 1

a beam deflecting device including a beam deflection array of reflective or transparent beam deflecting elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

a beam deflecting device including a beam deflection array of reflective or transparent beam deflecting elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS9523923B2Illumination system of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US9523923B2 patent drawing
  • US9523923B2 patent drawing
  • US9523923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An illumination system of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus includes an optical raster element configured to produce a plurality of secondary light sources located in a system pupil surface. The optical raster element has a plurality of light entrance facets, each being associated with one of the secondary light sources. A beam deflecting device includes a beam deflection array of reflective or transparent beam deflecting elements, each being configured to illuminate a spot on one of the light entrance facets at a position that is variable by changing a deflection angle produced by the beam deflecting element. A control unit is configured to control the beam deflection elements such that variable light patterns assembled from the spots can be formed on at least one of the plurality of light entrance facets.