Micromechanical Part Opening with Convex Rigid Areas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing micromechanical parts with alternating rigid and elastic areas fail to achieve a balance between low assembly force and high clamping force, leading to risks of fracture and microcracks during assembly, and do not allow for easy detection of defective assemblies.

Innovation Solution

A micromechanical part with an opening edge configuration featuring alternating rigid and elastic areas, where the rigid areas project convexly into the opening, allowing for precise centering and increased tolerance range, and featuring three rigid and three elastic areas for isostatic contact, which reduces the risk of microcracks and facilitates easy detection of assembly quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an opening with alternating rigid and elastic areas is used, then the risk of fracture is reduced, but the assembly force and clamping force cannot be simultaneously optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk of fractureVSAvoidassembly force and clamping force balance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The opening edge is designed with alternating rigid areas and elastic areas, where each area has different mechanical properties. The rigid areas (with convex portions) provide structural support and centering, while the elastic areas provide flexibility and clamping force. This local differentiation allows the structure to simultaneously achieve low assembly force and high clamping force without fracture risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The opening edge is segmented into multiple discrete rigid areas and elastic areas rather than being a continuous structure. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each area's function - rigid areas for positioning and support, elastic areas for compliance and clamping - resolving the contradiction between assembly force and clamping force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the rigid areas are made larger to increase clamping force, then the transmission torque increases, but the assembly force also increases causing higher fracture risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission torqueVSAvoidfracture risk during assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By creating distinct rigid areas with convex portions and elastic areas with different mechanical properties, the structure can generate high transmission torque through the rigid areas while the elastic areas absorb assembly forces through deformation, preventing fracture even with larger rigid area dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the opening shape is modified to improve centering precision, then the assembly quality increases, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentering precisionVSAvoidopening shape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centering function is localized to specific rigid areas with convex portions that have predetermined geometries. These convex portions naturally guide the spindle into correct positioning without requiring complex overall opening shapes, achieving high centering precision through simple local features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional opening shapes are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but defective assemblies with microcracks cannot be easily detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddefect detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The convex portions of the rigid areas serve as visual indicators. When the micromechanical part is properly assembled on the spindle, the convex portions make specific contact patterns that can be visually inspected. Deviations from the expected contact pattern indicate potential defects or microcracks, enabling easy quality control without complex inspection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables precise centering, reduces the risk of fracture and microcracks, increases assembly tolerance, and simplifies quality control by allowing for the detection of excessive clamping or interference fits, resulting in assemblies with virtually zero probability of defects.

Implementation Method 1

whose edges comprise an alternating arrangement of rigid areas and elastic areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7926355B2Micromechanical part with an opening for fastening to a spindle
Publication Date: 2011.04.19 ROLEX SA
  • US7926355B2 patent drawing
  • US7926355B2 patent drawing
  • US7926355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This micromechanical part is intended to be fastened to a spindle and has at least one opening (10, 20, 30) whose edges comprise an alternating arrangement of rigid areas (11) and elastic areas (12, 22, 32). It is possible for those ends (13) of the rigid areas (11) closest to the center C of the opening (10, 20, 30) to be connected by a first circle C1 having a diameter greater than the diameter of a second circle C2 connecting those ends (15, 25, 27) of the elastic areas (12, 22, 32) closest to the center of the opening. In this micromechanical part, each rigid area (11) is formed by a convex portion projecting into the opening (10, 20, 30).