Micromobility Collision Alerts Using Speed-Triggered Warning Modes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of accidents and injuries associated with micromobility vehicles poses a barrier to their wider adoption for transportation, as existing technologies have not effectively addressed the need for real-time collision warnings and safety alerts.

Innovation Solution

A collision warning system for micromobility vehicles, equipped with proximity sensors, speed sensors, and a controller that activates warning devices based on calculated collision risks, including audible and visual alerts, and communicates alerts to remote devices in case of collisions or falls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If collision warning systems are implemented for micromobility vehicles, then safety and collision risk reduction are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the warning function into two distinct modes: bypass mode for low-speed operation and warning mode for high-speed operation. This segmentation allows the system to activate complex sensor processing and warning devices only when necessary, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high safety standards during critical high-speed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller pre-establishes speed thresholds and mode transition criteria before operation. By determining in advance when to switch between bypass and warning modes based on predetermined speed thresholds, the system avoids the need for complex real-time decision-making algorithms, thereby reducing computational complexity while ensuring reliable safety responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If warning devices are activated continuously, then collision detection capability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic mode switching based on speed threshold evaluation. The controller continuously monitors speed but only activates the energy-intensive warning devices when the vehicle enters the warning mode above the threshold. This periodic activation pattern maintains collision detection capability during critical high-speed phases while minimizing energy consumption during low-speed bypass mode operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the risk of collisions by providing timely warnings to riders and alerts to remote devices, enhancing safety and facilitating emergency responses.

Implementation Method 1

at least one proximity sensor includes a LiDAR sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the at least one proximity sensor is a LiDAR sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS11878761B2Collision alert systems and methods for micromobility vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.01.23 GEKOT INC
  • US11878761B2 patent drawing
  • US11878761B2 patent drawing
  • US11878761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Collision alert systems and methods for micromobility vehicles includes a proximity sensor, a speed sensor, a warning device, and a controller having a bypass mode and a warning mode. The controller compares the speed of the micromobility vehicle with a predetermined speed threshold, enters the bypass mode when the speed of the micromobility vehicle is less than the predetermined speed threshold, and enters the warning mode when the speed of the micromobility vehicle is greater than the predetermined speed threshold. The controller does not activate the warning device in the bypass mode. In the warning mode, calculates an estimated time until a potential collision with the object, compares the estimated time object with a predetermined time threshold, and generates a collision warning by activating the warning device in response to the estimated time until collision being less than the predetermined time threshold.