Microphase-Separated Coating for Insect and Ice Repulsion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current coatings for aircraft and aerospace surfaces fail to effectively reduce insect residue and ice adhesion, leading to increased drag, fuel consumption, and maintenance challenges, with existing solutions either being impractical, durable but non-effective, or requiring regular reapplication.

Innovation Solution

A microphase-separated composition comprising chemically distinct solid materials with different surface energies and a selectively absorbed liquid, such as a freezing-point depressant or lubricant, which enhances the coating's ability to repel debris and ice by creating a non-stick and anti-icing surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If sacrificial continually released liquid layers are used to reduce insect debris, then insect residue reduction is improved, but size and weight penalty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect residueVSAvoidweight penalty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The coating system uses self-healing microcapsules that automatically release repair agents when damaged, eliminating the need for external maintenance and continuous liquid application. The coating repairs itself by detecting damage and releasing encapsulated healing agents that restore the protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The coating incorporates a porous structure that allows controlled release of functional agents while maintaining a lightweight formulation. The porous matrix enables the coating to release insect-repellent agents gradually without requiring thick continuous liquid layers, thus reducing weight while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If nanostructured surfaces are applied to aircraft or automobile surfaces, then surface functionality is improved, but durability remains unproven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris adhesionVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coating combines multiple functional materials in a composite structure: a porous polymer matrix provides the base structure, microcapsules contain repair agents, and various functional particles (antimicrobial, insect-repellent) are embedded within. This composite approach ensures durability by combining the strengths of different materials while protecting against degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The coating incorporates microcapsules filled with repair agents that are distributed throughout the coating matrix before application. These pre-positioned capsules act as a cushion against future damage, automatically activating when the coating is compromised to restore its protective functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If mechanical scrapers or active washing systems are used, then debris removal is improved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris accumulationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coating creates a superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surface that passively repels debris through its microstructure and surface chemistry. Water and oil droplets roll off the surface carrying away contaminants, eliminating the need for mechanical scrapers or active washing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical debris removal systems with a chemically active surface that uses surface tension and adhesion forces to repel contaminants. The low-surface-energy coating materials create a barrier that prevents debris adhesion without requiring mechanical intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If low-surface-energy polymers are used for non-stick coatings, then debris release is improved, but lubrication for foreign substance clearance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion forceVSAvoiddebris clearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The coating incorporates hydrophilic channels distributed throughout the low-surface-energy matrix. These hydrophilic regions locally provide high surface energy that attracts and mobilizes water-based debris, while the surrounding low-surface-energy material prevents adhesion. This local quality differentiation enables both non-stick properties and effective debris clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The porous structure of the coating creates capillary channels that facilitate the movement of liquids and suspended debris across the surface. The porosity enables water to penetrate and flow through the coating structure, carrying foreign substances away from the surface efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composition effectively reduces insect residue and ice adhesion, providing a durable, low-maintenance solution that improves airflow and reduces fuel consumption while maintaining performance over time.

Implementation Method 1

the first solid material and the second solid material have different surface energies... creates a non-stick surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface energy reduction: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 2

a liquid selectively absorbed into either of the first solid material or the second solid material, such as a freezing-point depressant... provides anti-icing surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing-point depression: Freezing

Implementation Method 3

The liquid may be a lubricant... promotes clearance of foreign substances

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS10876025B2Bugphobic and icephobic compositions with liquid additives
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 HRL LAB
  • US10876025B2 patent drawing
  • US10876025B2 patent drawing
  • US10876025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some variations provide a composition comprising: a first solid material and a second solid material that are chemically distinct and microphase-separated; and at least one liquid selectively absorbed into either of the first solid material or the second solid material. The first and second solid materials are preferably present as phase-separated regions of a copolymer, such as in a segmented copolymer (e.g., a urethane-urea copolymer). The liquid may be a freezing-point depressant for water. For example, the liquid may be selected from methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, or glycerol. The liquid may be a lubricant. For example, the liquid may be selected from fluorinated oils, siloxanes, petroleum-derived oils, mineral oil, or plant-derived oils. The liquid may consist of or include water. The liquid may be an electrolyte. For example, the liquid may be selected from poly(ethylene glycol), ionic liquids, dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, or methyl ethyl dicarbonate.