Microporous Atomizing Core to Reduce Heating Element Soot

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The accumulation of tobacco soot on the surface and periphery of the heating element in conventional atomizers affects user experience by causing burnt or peculiar smells and potentially harmful gases.

Innovation Solution

An atomizing core with a protective layer having micropores (30%-70% porosity and 100 μm-500 μm thickness) covering the heating element, which filters out liquid and solid particles to prevent soot formation, combined with a vent hole or through groove to facilitate smoke discharge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a protective layer is added to cover the heating element, then tobacco soot accumulation is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetobacco soot accumulationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective layer is designed with micropores having a porosity of 30%-70% to enable selective filtration. The porous structure allows smoke to pass through while trapping liquid and solid particles that would otherwise accumulate as soot on the heating element, thus reducing harmful factors without requiring a completely solid barrier

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The protective layer acts as an intermediary component between the heating element and the incoming smoke. It intercepts and filters particles from the smoke before they reach the heating element surface, preventing direct contact and accumulation while still allowing the smoke to pass through for user inhalation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the protective layer thickness is increased to improve filtration, then soot reduction effectiveness increases, but smoke flow resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoot reduction effectivenessVSAvoidsmoke flow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The protective layer thickness is optimized to a specific range of 100 μm to 500 μm, and the porosity is controlled at 30%-70%. These parameter optimizations ensure sufficient filtration capability to reduce soot while maintaining adequate smoke flow. The micropore size and distribution are carefully controlled to balance particle capture efficiency with smoke permeability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the protective layer covers the entire heating element, then soot accumulation is maximally reduced, but heating efficiency may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoot accumulationVSAvoidheating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The protective layer is designed with non-uniform micropore distribution, where the pore size and density vary in different regions. The micropores are strategically distributed to provide effective filtration while maintaining localized areas that facilitate efficient heat transfer to the liquid, thus preserving heating efficiency while reducing soot accumulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces tobacco soot accumulation, improves taste and safety by minimizing the formation of burnt smells and toxic gases, while ensuring stable and reliable operation of the atomizer.

Implementation Method 1

the heating portion be capable of generating heat to atomize the liquid on the atomization surface to form smoke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

the heating portion be capable of generating heat to atomize the liquid on the atomization surface to form smoke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

micropores are formed in the protective layer with a porosity in a range of 30% to 70%... smoke being capable of overflowing from the protective layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 4

micropores are formed in the protective layer with a porosity in a range of 30% to 70%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Implementation Method 5

The substrate blocks a liquid storage cavity in the atomizer and can buffer and conduct the liquid in the liquid storage cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS12532917B2Atomizing core, atomizer and electronic atomization device
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 SHENZHEN SMOORE TECH LTD
  • US12532917B2 patent drawing
  • US12532917B2 patent drawing
  • US12532917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more examples relate to an atomizing core, an atomizer and an electronic atomization device. The atomizing core includes: a substrate, having an atomization surface and being configured to buffer and conduct a liquid; a heating element, comprising a heating portion attached to the substrate, the heating portion being capable of generating heat to atomize the liquid on the atomization surface to form smoke; and a protective layer, provided on the atomization surface and covering the heating portion, and smoke being capable of overflowing from the protective layer.