Adaptive Microprocessor Instruction Grouping for Branch Penalty Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microprocessor systems face performance bottlenecks due to branch instruction penalties, cache miss rates, and instruction access time issues, which are not adequately addressed by existing technologies that rely on branch prediction and dynamic binary translation.

Innovation Solution

The system employs an adaptive microprocessor that groups and trims branch instructions with non-branch instructions into compact, ciphered instructions, allowing for parallel execution and reducing the number of branch instructions, thereby alleviating branch penalties and optimizing cache memory usage without the need for additional hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If branch prediction hardware is used to handle branch instructions, then the processing speed of branch instructions is improved, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebranch instruction processing speedVSAvoidbranch prediction hardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes branch instructions from the instruction stream before execution. By identifying and eliminating branch instructions during compilation or code generation, the system avoids the need for complex branch prediction hardware while maintaining processing speed. The extracted branch logic is replaced with equivalent unconditional control flow mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs branch trimming and instruction grouping as preliminary actions during compilation or code generation, before the program is executed. By preprocessing the code to remove branches and group instructions, the system eliminates the need for runtime branch prediction, reducing hardware complexity while maintaining execution speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional instruction formatting is used, then software compatibility is maintained, but the instruction memory size and access time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware compatibilityVSAvoidinstruction access time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple traditional instructions into single grouped instructions. By combining sequential non-branch instructions into compact grouped instruction formats, the system reduces the total number of instructions that need to be stored and fetched from memory, thereby reducing instruction memory size and access time while maintaining functional equivalence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the format parameters of instructions by introducing compact grouped instruction formats. These new formats encode multiple operations in fewer bits and fewer instruction slots, reducing memory requirements and access time while preserving the original program's functionality through systematic translation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If branch instructions are eliminated through trimming, then branch misprediction penalties are reduced, but the software code structure changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing throughputVSAvoidsoftware code structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs branch trimming as a preliminary code transformation step during compilation or code generation. By eliminating branches beforehand and replacing them with equivalent control flow constructs, the system improves computing throughput by removing branch misprediction penalties while systematically adapting the code structure to the new branchless format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the software code by transforming branched control flow into equivalent branchless constructs. This involves modifying the code organization and instruction sequences while preserving the program's logical behavior, enabling improved throughput without losing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If instruction grouping is performed to reduce memory usage, then cache memory size is reduced, but the decoding complexity of instructions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecache memory sizeVSAvoidinstruction decoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the decoding process into distinct stages: identification of grouped instructions, extraction of constituent operations, and execution of individual operations. By dividing the decoding task into manageable segments, the system reduces cache memory size through grouping while managing decoding complexity through systematic segmentation of the decoding workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary data structures and translation layers that bridge the compact grouped instruction format and the execution units. These intermediaries handle the complexity of decoding grouped instructions, allowing the system to reduce cache memory size while isolating decoding complexity in dedicated translation hardware or software layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8667476B1Instruction grouping and ungrouping apparatus and method for an adaptive microprocessor system
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 ADAPTMICROSYS LLC
  • US8667476B1 patent drawing
  • US8667476B1 patent drawing
  • US8667476B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Multiple instructions including branch instructions are grouped into a condensed variable length instruction. A trimmed and grouped branch instruction branches to one of the instructions in the same group. Therefore, a grouped instruction including branch(es) inherently executes correct branch behaviors without deploying any branch prediction schemes. In addition, a grouped instruction in a condensed form delivers multiple operations to execute without fetching all of the instructions grouped separately from the instruction memory via its caches while conserving instruction memory and/or cache as well as decreasing the number of bit switching on the bus. Software developers can make their own compatible, compact and ciphered instruction sets after grouping existing instructions in their software compiled with existing software compilers and the associated microprocessors.