Structured Microreactor Ozonolysis for High Space-Time Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ozonolysis processes face challenges with space-time yield and selectivity, leading to uneven temperature loads, product quality issues, safety risks due to unstable ozonation products, and significant gas circulation and pollution, which limits ozone concentration and increases energy and economic burdens.

Innovation Solution

The process employs a structured microreaction system with two reaction zones and a cooling zone, allowing for controlled ozonolysis and oxidative or reductive cleavage of ozonization products in a series of microreactors, enhancing heat and mass transfer, and enabling higher ozone concentrations while ensuring safety by operating below explosion limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional reactors are used for ozonolysis, then the process is simple to operate, but space-time yield and selectivity are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace-time yieldVSAvoidreactor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple channels with different depths (20-1800 μm) arranged in parallel, allowing simultaneous optimization of heat transfer and residence time distribution. This segmentation enables higher space-time yields while maintaining operational simplicity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from conventional macro-scale reactors to micro-scale channels, utilizing the micro-dimension to achieve enhanced heat and mass transfer coefficients. This dimensional change fundamentally improves productivity without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Temperature

If conventional reactors are used, then device complexity is low, but temperature control is poor leading to hot spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidheat dissipation structure
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor channels are segmented into multiple parallel pathways with controlled depths, creating numerous heat transfer interfaces. This segmentation distributes heat generation across many small surfaces, preventing hot spots while maintaining relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different channel depths are implemented to create localized heat transfer characteristics. Deeper channels provide longer residence time while shallower channels enhance heat dissipation, allowing each region to optimize for its specific functional requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If ozone concentration is increased to improve productivity, then space-time yield increases, but safety risks increase due to explosive decomposition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveozone concentrationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is segmented into multiple parallel channels, allowing the system to handle high ozone concentrations safely by distributing the reaction across many small pathways. This segmentation prevents accumulation of unstable intermediates and reduces the risk of explosive decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the reactor (channel depth, cross-section) to optimize the relationship between ozone concentration, residence time, and heat transfer. These parameter changes enable safe operation at higher ozone concentrations by controlling the reaction kinetics and heat generation rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If higher ozone concentrations are used, then productivity improves, but by-product formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveozone concentrationVSAvoidby-product formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different channel depths create localized reaction conditions that optimize selectivity. Shallower channels provide better heat transfer and shorter residence times, reducing the formation of unwanted by-products while deeper channels maintain higher conversion rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor design changes physical parameters to control reaction kinetics, allowing operation at higher ozone concentrations while maintaining selectivity. The optimized channel geometry controls mass transfer rates and residence times to minimize by-product formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If conventional reactors are used, then construction is simple, but heat dissipation is insufficient leading to safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidheat dissipation structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor structure is segmented into multiple parallel channels with varying depths, creating extensive heat transfer surfaces. This segmentation provides superior heat dissipation capacity without requiring complex external cooling systems, as the heat is distributed across numerous internal interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The channel depth is varied locally to optimize heat dissipation characteristics. Deeper channels provide longer heat transfer paths while shallower channels provide better thermal contact, creating a distributed heat management system that enhances safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves space-time yields and selectivities, reduces by-product formation, simplifies downstream processing, and allows for higher ozone concentrations, thereby enhancing product quality and reducing energy and economic burdens.

Implementation Method 1

the significantly improved removal of the reaction heat due to the high surface-to-volume ratio

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

the significantly improved removal of the reaction heat due to the high surface-to-volume ratio as well as the defined flow regimes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

In the first part of the reaction, a gas/liquid reaction of ozone with the olefinic feedstock, ozonides are formed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOzonolysis: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

During oxidative ozonolysis, in which the intermediate ozonation products are oxidized, ketones or carboxylic acids are formed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 5

If the intermediate products are cleaved by reducing means, aldehydes are obtained

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentEP1860093B1Method for ozonolysis of unsaturated compounds
Publication Date: 2015.12.02 AMRIL

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for the ozonolysis of unsaturated feedstocks, which is characterized by the fact that the reaction is carried out in a structured reactor.