Microscope Control Unit Ergonomic Ambidextrous Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microscope control units face challenges in providing a uniform, ergonomic arrangement of cylindrical operating elements for x/y and z-adjustments, accommodating both left- and right-handers, and allowing flexible positioning, while ensuring precise stage adjustments and minimizing accidental movements.

Innovation Solution

A bow-shaped support frame with vertically standing pillars and parallel support arms houses x/y operating elements on the underside of the support arm and a z-adjustment element on the pillar, allowing for adjustable positioning and intuitive operation, with cylindrical barrels of different diameters and a rotatable disc for z-adjustment, along with integrated electronic control for motorized adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manually operable operating elements are attached to the mechanical stage for x/y-adjustment, then the operator gets tactile feedback from frictional forces, but the arrangement is not ambidextrous and requires sufficient clearance on the stage surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactile feedbackVSAvoidambidextrous operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

A separate control unit with operating elements is introduced as an intermediary device between the operator and the mechanical stage. This control unit can be freely positioned on the work stage and provides tactile feedback through frictional forces while being accessible to both left-handers and right-handers, thus resolving the contradiction between tactile feedback and ambidextrous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into separate components: the mechanical stage remains independent while the operating elements are housed in a separate controllable unit. This allows the operating elements to be positioned optimally for ambidextrous use while maintaining the tactile feedback mechanism through frictional forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If operating elements are accommodated in separate housings for motor-driven stage adjustments, then ambidextrous operation is enabled, but precise positioning becomes unreliable due to ease of movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveambidextrous operationVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit incorporates feedback mechanisms where the position of the operating elements is continuously monitored and transmitted to the mechanical stage. This feedback system ensures that even though the operating elements are easily movable for ambidextrous use, the positioning remains precise through electronic feedback and control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If additional control wheels for z-drive are added to the trackball and joystick controllers, then z-adjustment is integrated, but the operator must exercise additional concentration due to different reactions to different movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrated z-adjustmentVSAvoidoperational concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The operating elements for x/y-adjustment and z-adjustment are designed with homogeneous characteristics - all are cylindrical barrels that can be gripped and rotated in the same manner. This uniformity in form and operation reduces the cognitive load on the operator, as the same gripping and rotating motion applies to all adjustment directions, thus resolving the contradiction between integrated control and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Productivity

If different gear ratios are used for coarse and fine adjustments with coaxially aligned operating elements, then rapid stage adjustment and precise positioning are achieved, but the design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment speedVSAvoidgear ratio complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic switching between different gear ratios based on the operational mode required. The control unit can electronically switch between coarse adjustment gear ratios for rapid stage movement and fine adjustment gear ratios for precise positioning, maintaining productivity while managing complexity through dynamic rather than static gear configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8027753B2Microscope control unit
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 MARZHAUSER WETZLAR
  • US8027753B2 patent drawing
  • US8027753B2 patent drawing
  • US8027753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microscope control unit which is composed of a bracket-shaped support frame having a support area, a pillar standing vertically erect on the support area, and a support arm, which emanates from the upper end of the pillar and is aligned parallel to the support area.