Microscope Depth of Field Determination via F-Stop Projection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microscopes face challenges in accurately focusing on transparent or low contrast specimens due to the subjective nature of traditional focusing methods and the difficulty in determining the desired depth of field, which results in imaging beyond the area of interest.

Innovation Solution

A microscope system and method that empirically determines the depth of field by projecting an F-stop onto a specimen, analyzing contrast at incremental positions, and adjusting the relative movement between the specimen and objective lens to establish the boundaries of the depth of field, allowing for precise focusing and imaging at a defined depth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional subjective focusing methods are used, then the microscope can be operated with simple mechanisms, but the focusing accuracy and precision deteriorate due to human subjectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocusing accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual focusing system with an automated optical sensing system. A light source projects patterns onto the specimen, and a sensor detects the reflected or transmitted light to objectively determine focus quality, eliminating reliance on human visual judgment and manual adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the sensor continuously monitors focus quality by analyzing light patterns at different focal planes, and this information is used to automatically adjust the focal position. The system iteratively refines the focus by comparing sensor readings against optimal focus criteria and making real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Area of stationary object

If the depth of field is increased to capture more specimen areas, then the imaging coverage is improved, but the imaging precision of specific depths deteriorates due to blur from out-of-focus regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging coverageVSAvoidimaging precision at specific depth
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the three-dimensional specimen into multiple discrete focal planes or depth layers. The system sequentially captures images at each segmented depth plane and can reconstruct a composite three-dimensional representation, allowing precise imaging of specific depths while maintaining the option to synthesize broader coverage through computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar imaging to three-dimensional volumetric imaging by adding the depth dimension as a discrete variable. The system captures image data across multiple focal planes and uses computational algorithms to reconstruct and display the specimen in three dimensions, enabling selective visualization of specific depth regions while preserving overall structural context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Extent of automation

If automated focus systems using light reflection are used, then the focusing automation is improved, but the ability to focus on transparent specimens deteriorates due to insufficient reflectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus automationVSAvoidfocus reliability on transparent specimens
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary optical element or coating on the specimen or objective lens that enhances light interaction. This intermediary layer increases the contrast between reflected and transmitted light, enabling the automated sensor to reliably detect focal positions on transparent specimens that would otherwise be invisible to reflection-based sensing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Volume of stationary object

If multiple focal planes are captured to improve depth coverage, then the volumetric imaging is improved, but the imaging time deteriorates due to sequential capture requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolumetric imaging coverageVSAvoidimaging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic or pulsed illumination and rapid sequential capture of focal planes. The light source is modulated in a periodic manner, and the system captures multiple depth planes in rapid succession during a single illumination cycle, significantly reducing the total imaging time compared to traditional sequential methods while maintaining complete volumetric coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and automated focusing on transparent or low contrast specimens, improving imaging precision by determining the working distance and depth of field, thereby allowing for clear imaging of specific areas within the specimen.

Implementation Method 1

projecting the F-stop onto the focal face at the first position to produce an F-stop projection thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical projection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS9488819B2Automatic microscopic focus system and method for analysis of transparent or low contrast specimens
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 NANOTRONICS IMAGING INC
  • US9488819B2 patent drawing
  • US9488819B2 patent drawing
  • US9488819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microscope system and method empirically determines the boundaries of the depth of field of an objective lens. The system and method are largely automated, with the manipulation of a specimen to be imaged being carried out by processors and associated equipment. Calculations of the empirical depth of field are also likewise automated. Upon empirically determining the boundaries of the depth of field, the specimen, particularly when transparent or translucent, can be accurately imaged at user-defined depths smaller than the depth of field.