Microscope Sample-Stage Holding Frame With Constant Axial Height

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microscope sample stage systems require separate holding frames for different modules, leading to increased complexity, cost, and reduced accessibility due to varying mechanical interfaces and heights.

Innovation Solution

A sample stage system with a holding frame that uses the same mechanical interface and maintains the same axial height regardless of whether an additional module is used, allowing the same frame to be used with or without the module, and incorporating a mechanical adapter component to ensure consistent sample support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate holding frames are used for different modules, then each module has its own optimized mechanical interface, but the number of components increases and complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule compatibilityVSAvoidnumber of holding frames
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal holding frame design with a standardized mechanical interface that can be used across multiple different modules (x-y stage, z-axis stage, levelling attachments). This single holding frame replaces the need for separate specialized holding frames for each module type, reducing component inventory while maintaining reliable mechanical connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical interface is segmented into standardized components (interface elements, mounting surfaces, engagement features) that can be consistently applied across different modules. This segmentation allows the holding frame to be designed as a modular component that interfaces uniformly with various stage types without requiring custom designs for each module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional modules are attached to the sample stage, then functional enhancements are provided, but the sample becomes less accessible from below due to increased height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional enhancementVSAvoidsample accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The holding frame serves as an intermediary component between the additional module and the sample stage. By providing a standardized interface at a controlled height, the holding frame acts as a mediator that allows functional modules to be attached while maintaining consistent sample accessibility. The sample support plane height is preserved regardless of which module is attached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the height issue by designing the holding frame with a standardized axial height that compensates for variations in module thickness. The mechanical interface is designed to maintain the sample support plane at a consistent vertical position, effectively managing the z-dimension to preserve accessibility while allowing module attachments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If the same holding frame is used with additional modules, then component inventory is reduced, but the mechanical interface must accommodate both the stage and module

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent inventoryVSAvoidinterface compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The holding frame is designed with a universal mechanical interface that can engage with both the sample stage and additional modules using the same standardized connection mechanism. This allows the single holding frame to be universally compatible across different configurations without requiring interface modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the interface requirements of the sample stage and additional modules into a single standardized mechanical interface design. The holding frame incorporates engagement features that can interface with both types of components using the same mounting mechanism, consolidating multiple interface requirements into one unified design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If separate holding frames are developed for each additional module, then each interface is optimized, but development effort and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface optimizationVSAvoiddevelopment effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of developing separate holding frames for each module, the patent creates a single universal holding frame design that works with all modules. This reduces development effort by eliminating the need to design, test, and document multiple separate holding frame variants while maintaining reliable interfaces through the standardized design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The holding frame design uses standardized parameter values (interface dimensions, mounting hole patterns, engagement feature geometries) that can be consistently applied across different modules. By fixing these parameters in the universal design, development effort is reduced while maintaining optimized interface characteristics for reliable mechanical connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250298234A1Sample stage system for a microscope and microscope
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US20250298234A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298234A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298234A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sample stage system and a microscope including a sample stage, a holding frame for receiving a sample, wherein an axial spatial direction is given by a normal direction of a plane of extent of the holding frame. The holding frame is set up for being arranged on the sample stage either alone or together with a mechanical adapter component or together with a mechanical functional component for the mechanical manipulation of the holding frame, wherein, at least for an initial position of the mechanical functional component, an axial height of the holding frame relative to the sample stage is the same regardless of whether the holding frame is arranged on the sample stage on its own or together with the mechanical adapter component or with the mechanical functional component.