Image Processing System for Microscope 3D Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-magnification microscope images often have a shallow depth of field, leading to inaccurate in-focus evaluation due to changes in the optical system's band, which can be exacerbated by noise not related to the object structure, hindering the creation of accurate all-in-focus or 3D reconstructed images.

Innovation Solution

An image processing system that includes a cutoff frequency acquisition unit to determine the optical system's cutoff frequency and a candidate value modification unit for data correction and interpolation, allowing for improved evaluation and synthesis of in-focus images by accounting for the optical system's parameters and noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high-magnification microscopy is used to achieve detailed imaging, then image resolution is improved, but depth of field becomes shallow leading to inaccurate in-focus evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidin-focus evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image processing into multiple stages: acquiring multiple images at different focal depths, evaluating in-focus states for each image, selecting best-in-focus images, and performing optimization processing. This segmentation allows high-resolution imaging while maintaining accurate in-focus evaluation through systematic multi-step processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary in-focus evaluation and selection before final image synthesis. By pre-evaluating the in-focus state of multiple images and selecting the best ones, the system ensures accurate in-focus assessment is established before creating the final high-resolution output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If optical system band changes are not compensated for, then processing simplicity is maintained, but in-focus evaluation accuracy deteriorates due to noise unrelated to object structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidin-focus evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts processing parameters based on the optical system's band characteristics. By acquiring band information and modifying evaluation parameters accordingly, the system compensates for optical system variations without requiring overly complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where band information from the optical system is continuously monitored and used to adjust processing parameters. This feedback loop ensures that in-focus evaluation remains accurate even when optical system characteristics change, without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple images at different focal planes are acquired to create all-in-focus images, then image coverage is improved, but processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage coverageVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent acquires multiple images at different focal planes (excessive action) to ensure complete coverage of the sample volume, then uses efficient evaluation and selection algorithms to process only the necessary portions. This approach guarantees comprehensive image coverage while minimizing unnecessary processing through optimized selection criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of in-focus states for all acquired images before final synthesis. By pre-identifying the best-in-focus images and their corresponding depth information, the system reduces the complexity of subsequent optimization processing and accelerates overall workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If in-focus evaluation is performed without considering optical system band, then processing speed is maintained, but estimation errors increase due to noise and band variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoid3D shape estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies evaluation parameters based on the optical system's band characteristics to optimize the balance between processing speed and accuracy. By adapting parameters such as frequency thresholds and evaluation criteria to match the actual optical band, the system maintains high processing speed while eliminating estimation errors caused by band-mismatched evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9942534B2Image processing system and microscope system including the same
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 EVIDENT CORP
  • US9942534B2 patent drawing
  • US9942534B2 patent drawing
  • US9942534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing system includes an acquisition unit, a candidate value estimation unit, a cutoff frequency acquisition unit and a candidate value modification unit. The acquisition unit is configured to acquire an image of a sample taken via an optical system. The candidate value estimation unit is configured to estimate a candidate value of a 3D shape of the sample based on the image. The cutoff frequency acquisition unit is configured to acquire a cutoff frequency of the optical system based on information of the optical system. The candidate value modification unit is configured to perform at least one of data correction and data interpolation for the candidate value based on the cutoff frequency and calculate a modified candidate value.