Microscope Scanner Focus Analysis for Adaptive Rescanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Whole Slide Imaging scanners face challenges in maintaining focus across the entire tissue sample due to slide distortions and non-uniform tissue thickness, leading to areas outside the depth of focus that are unsuitable for diagnosis, and analyzing large image datasets is computationally intensive and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A method that generates focus control data during the imaging scan to analyze efficacy, allowing for adjustments in scanning parameters to improve focus and reduce computational demands, including pre-scan for low-resolution image selection and automated image analysis to identify sample areas and surface details.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If focus tracking mechanism is used to maintain focus across the entire tissue sample, then imaging quality is improved, but device complexity increases and focus accuracy may still be insufficient due to slide distortions and non-uniform tissue thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus accuracyVSAvoidfocus tracking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical focus tracking mechanism with an optical/electronic solution. Instead of physically adjusting the focal plane across the slide, the system captures images at multiple focal depths and uses software algorithms to select or combine the in-focus regions, thereby eliminating complex mechanical movement while maintaining focus accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the depth dimension to the imaging process by capturing images at multiple focal planes (z-stack). This allows the system to overcome the limited depth of field of the objective lens by sampling across the entire depth range of the tissue sample, effectively extending the usable depth of focus without mechanical adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If complete image analysis is performed to assess scan quality, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large image dataset into smaller regions or tiles for analysis. Instead of processing the entire slide image at once, the system analyzes individual regions independently, which can be processed in parallel, thereby maintaining comprehensive quality assessment while significantly reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs analysis on a subset of key regions rather than the complete image. By focusing computational resources on critical areas (such as regions with detected anomalies or representative sample areas), the system achieves sufficient quality assessment without the full computational burden of analyzing every pixel across the entire slide

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If high-resolution scanning is performed across the entire slide, then image quality is improved, but scanning time and data volume increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidscanning speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different imaging strategies to different regions of the slide. High-resolution scanning is performed only on regions containing tissue samples or areas of diagnostic interest, while background or empty regions are scanned at lower resolution or skipped entirely, thereby maintaining diagnostic quality while reducing overall scanning time and data volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid assessment of scan quality, allowing for timely correction of focus errors and optimization of scanning parameters to ensure high-quality imaging with minimal delay and reduced processing resources.

Implementation Method 1

acquiring an image of the target at each of a plurality of locations along the image scan path using the detector array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

acquiring an image of the target at each of a plurality of locations along the image scan path using the detector array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight transmission: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

a Whole Slide Imaging scanner typically has a focus tracking mechanism such as that described by U.S. Pat. No. 9,116,035 to achieve the correct focus across all of the tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFocus tracking: Focusing

Implementation Method 4

the natural aperture of the imaging limits the depth of focus to around 1 μm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepth of focus limitation: Depth of Field

Data Source

PatentUS12422658B2Method for analysing scanning efficacy
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US12422658B2 patent drawing
  • US12422658B2 patent drawing
  • US12422658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for operating a microscope scanner. A first imaging scan is performed of one or more area(s) of interest, AOI, on a target including a sample. This involves moving a detector array relative to the target along an image scan path and acquiring an image of the target at each of a plurality of locations along the image scan path. Focus control data is generated during the imaging scan by calculating a focus merit value at each said location along the image scan path. The focal height of the detector array is then adjusted along the image scan path based on the focus merit values. The efficacy of the first imaging scan is analysed using the focus control data and a change to one or more scanning parameters from the first imaging scan is determined, for the performance of a second imaging scan, based on this analysis.