Microscopic Texture Authentication via Digital Fingerprinting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack effective and cost-efficient methods for uniquely identifying textures at a microscopic level across various materials, failing to address the significant issue of counterfeit goods and documents, which result in substantial market losses.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes a fingerprinting mechanism that captures and compares microscopic texture images using partially coherent light, converting them into low-dimensional representations for similarity analysis, enabling unique identification of materials like fabric, paper, and metal through invariant GaborPCA and gradient histogram feature detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If microscopic texture imaging is used for authentication, then identification accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetexture identification accuracyVSAvoidmicroscopic imaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy of the microscopic texture pattern and compares it with a reference copy stored in a database. This copying approach allows authentication without requiring complex physical measurement devices, as the microscopic images are captured and stored as digital data that can be compared through computational algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical microscopic imaging equipment with a simplified system that uses standard digital cameras or smartphones to capture microscopic textures. The authentication process is then performed through computational comparison algorithms rather than complex mechanical measurement systems, reducing device complexity while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If microscopic texture analysis is applied to multiple materials, then versatility is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial type coverageVSAvoidtexture pattern differentiation threshold
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the authentication threshold parameter based on the specific material being analyzed. Different materials have different texture characteristics, so the similarity threshold is dynamically modified to match the expected variation in each material type. This allows the system to maintain high precision across diverse materials without requiring a single fixed high-precision threshold for all materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the authentication and verification of physical objects by determining if microscopic texture patterns match within a predetermined threshold, effectively addressing the challenge of counterfeit detection across different materials and conditions.

Implementation Method 1

when partially coherent light falls onto an object, the scattered light when projected to a screen can produce bright and dark regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS11210495B2Systems, methods and computer-accessible mediums for authentication and verification of physical objects
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 NEW YORK UNIV
  • US11210495B2 patent drawing
  • US11210495B2 patent drawing
  • US11210495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary methodology, procedure, system, method and computer-accessible medium can be provided for authenticating a non-digital medium of a physical object, by receiving at least one image of video of at least one marked or unmarked region, and comparing the first microscopic image or video of at least one marked or unmarked region with at least one second microscopic image or video relating to the non-digital medium to determine if a similarity between the first and second microscopic images or videos matches or exceeds a predetermined amount.