Microscopy Verification Algorithm for Image Processing Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microscopy methods face issues with incorrect image processing results, which can lead to incorrect sample identification and potential damage, especially when automated adjustments are made based on these errors, and verifying these results using confidence intervals is laborious and unreliable.

Innovation Solution

A microscopy method that incorporates a verification algorithm using a machine learning algorithm trained with reference images and results to assess the output of image processing algorithms, allowing for the identification of correct or incorrect image processing without requiring knowledge of the image processing algorithm's operations, enabling reliable detection of errors and preventing further use of incorrect results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If an image processing algorithm is used to automatically identify sample regions, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to incorrect image processing results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated sample examination throughputVSAvoidaccuracy of image processing results
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification algorithm receives the image processing result as input and outputs a verification result that feeds back into the automated examination process. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically detect and reject incorrect image processing results without manual intervention, maintaining high productivity while improving reliability through automated quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If confidence intervals are calculated to verify image processing results, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification of image processing resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of verification functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification algorithm acts as an intermediary component that sits between the image processing algorithm and the automated examination process. It provides a standardized interface for verification that can work with different image processing algorithms without requiring modifications to them, thus reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification algorithm uses reference images and reference verification results to create a model of correct image processing outcomes. By comparing new image processing results against this reference model, the system can verify results without needing to understand the internal operations of the image processing algorithm, simplifying the verification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If manual verification of image processing results is performed, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to large quantity of samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of incorrect image processingVSAvoidthroughput in high-volume sample analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification algorithm enables the system to perform self-verification of image processing results automatically. The algorithm independently assesses whether image processing results are correct using the verification model trained on reference data, eliminating the need for manual verification while maintaining high reliability even in high-volume sample analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If existing image processing algorithms are updated or changed, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to lack of verification compatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to use new image processing algorithmsVSAvoidverification of new algorithm results
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification algorithm is designed with universal applicability to work with different types of image processing algorithms. By using reference images and reference verification results to create a general verification model, the system can verify results from various image processing algorithms without requiring algorithm-specific verification logic, thus maintaining reliability while supporting adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20200371333A1Microscopy method, microscope and computer program with verification algorithm for image processing results
Publication Date: 2020.11.26 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US20200371333A1 patent drawing
  • US20200371333A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A microscopy method for sample examination comprises at least the following steps: recording at least one microscope image; supplying the at least one microscope image to an image processing algorithm, which outputs an image processing result; supplying the image processing result to a verification algorithm, which comprises a machine learning algorithm that has been trained using reference images and associated reference verification results; ascertaining a verification result by way of the verification algorithm using the trained machine learning algorithm and based on the supplied image processing result; and outputting the verification result. A computer program comprises a corresponding verification algorithm for checking in an analogous manner image processing results of microscope images.