Microstrip Filter Resonator Coupling Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional microstrip line resonators face challenges in achieving high Q values in high-frequency bands due to dominant radiation losses, which hinder the realization of filters with steep skirt properties.

Innovation Solution

The design involves a filter structure with resonators formed of microstrip lines connected in cascade, where inter-resonator couplings are optimized by positioning coupling elements within ±45° ranges from voltage maximum points, reducing radiation losses and enhancing Q values by minimizing unnecessary radiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional microstrip line resonators are used in high-frequency bands, then the filter can be implemented, but radiation losses increase and Q values decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation lossVSAvoidQ value
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning coupling elements at specific locations (within ±45° from voltage maximum points) rather than uniformly across the resonator. This localized optimization at critical coupling points reduces radiation losses while maintaining the overall filter performance, directly addressing the contradiction between energy loss and reliability in high-frequency bands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of coupling element positioning from conventional locations to optimized positions within ±45° ranges from voltage maximum points. This parameter change in the spatial configuration of coupling elements reduces radiation losses and improves Q values, resolving the contradiction between energy loss and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If inter-resonator coupling is optimized by positioning coupling elements within ±45° ranges from voltage maximum points, then Q values increase and radiation losses reduce, but filter design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQ valueVSAvoidfilter design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent defines a specific parameter range (±45° from voltage maximum points) for coupling element positioning that optimizes Q values while providing clear design guidelines. This parameter specification balances the need for high performance with practical design complexity by establishing explicit positioning criteria rather than requiring complex optimization algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If coupling elements are positioned to reduce radiation losses, then frequency selectivity improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling element positioning precisionVSAvoidfrequency selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent focuses precision requirements on local coupling element positions within ±45° ranges from voltage maximum points rather than requiring uniform precision across the entire filter structure. This localized approach to quality control improves frequency selectivity while concentrating manufacturing precision requirements on critical coupling points only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies a parameter range (±45°) that provides a tolerance window for coupling element positioning. This parameter definition balances the need for precise frequency selectivity with practical manufacturing capabilities by establishing acceptable positioning ranges rather than requiring absolute precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces radiation losses and achieves high Q values even in high-frequency bands, enabling the creation of filters with improved frequency selectivity and insertion loss properties.

Implementation Method 1

a filter to limit a frequency band for a radio communication system is structured by resonant units connected in cascade. Each resonator provided in the resonant unit includes an inductor and a capacitor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

inter-resonator couplings are optimized by positioning coupling elements within ±45° ranges from voltage maximum points, reducing radiation losses and enhancing Q values

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7397330B2Filter and radio communication device using the same
Publication Date: 2008.07.08 KK TOSHIBA
  • US7397330B2 patent drawing
  • US7397330B2 patent drawing
  • US7397330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A filter includes a resonant unit which has a plurality of resonators respectively formed of each microstrip line and connected in cascade with one another, and a coupling unit which has at least one inter-resonator coupling of the resonant unit in an area within a range of ±45° (⅛-wavelength) in an electrical length from a voltage maximum point at a intermediate of the microstrip line.