3D Microstructure File Format for Dense Wireframe Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 3D printing technologies face challenges in directly printing extremely dense microstructures such as fur, feather, or woven fabric due to the lack of efficient digital representation of CAD models with fine material structure, leading to large file sizes and computational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a new file format, MESO (.MESO), which efficiently represents and processes 3D microstructures by using a data structure comprising node information, wire information, and shell information, allowing for high-fidelity representation of intricate features and enabling parallel processing of wireframe models, thereby reducing material usage and weight, and enabling the creation of mechanical metamaterials and biomimetic designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional CAD models with triangulated mesh are used to represent dense microstructures, then geometric fidelity is improved, but file size becomes extremely large and processing becomes computationally expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric fidelityVSAvoidfile size and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the microstructure representation into hierarchical levels: macro-geometry defined by coarse mesh and micro-features defined by procedural parameters. This segmentation allows the model to store only essential geometric information at each level, avoiding the need to represent every microscopic detail explicitly, thereby reducing file size while maintaining geometric fidelity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining micro-features through procedural generation rules and parameters rather than storing complete geometric data. The micro-features are generated on-demand during slicing or printing operations, which reduces the initial file size and computational burden while preserving the ability to achieve high geometric fidelity when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If high-resolution 3D printing is used to print extremely dense microstructures, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to computational expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting resolutionVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-processing the model into a compact hierarchical format with defined micro-feature parameters before slicing. This preliminary structuring enables faster slicing operations because the system only needs to generate micro-features on-demand using stored parameters rather than processing complete high-resolution geometry, thereby improving productivity while maintaining the capability for high-resolution printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively generating micro-features only where and when they are needed during the printing process, rather than pre-processing all possible micro-features. This approach reduces computational expense while maintaining manufacturing precision for the actual printed features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If complete geometric representation of every strand is created, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to file management difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detailVSAvoidfile processing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model data into manageable hierarchical components: macro-geometry, micro-feature parameters, and material properties. This segmentation makes file management easier by organizing data into structured, modifiable sections rather than a monolithic complete geometric representation, while still enabling high manufacturing precision through procedural generation of detailed features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to control micro-feature characteristics (such as density, size, and distribution) without changing the underlying file structure. This allows easy modification of feature details by adjusting parameters rather than rewriting complete geometric data, thereby improving ease of manufacture while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11567474B2Systems, methods and file format for 3D printing of microstructures
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 OPT IND INC
  • US11567474B2 patent drawing
  • US11567474B2 patent drawing
  • US11567474B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and new file formats are provided for printing 3D microstructures. In some implementations, a new file format is provided that defines 3D objects by a wireframe model expressed as a collection of wires. Because wires and their parameters are defined within the new file format, objects may be processed more efficiently and quickly to support 3D rendering operations. Such methods may be used to print new articles, such as eyelashes, bushes, swabs and other novel items.