Microstructured Electroadhesion Surfaces for Reversible Tissue Adhesion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to effectively utilize microstructured surfaces for electroadhesion without causing frictional or abrasive damage, particularly in surgical settings, and lack theoretical models for optimizing electroadhesive forces at a microscopic scale.

Innovation Solution

The development of electro-microstructured devices with hierarchical microstructures and embedded electrodes that generate localized electric fields, allowing for controlled transitions between hydrophilic and hydrophobic states, and utilizing monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations to enhance adhesion and repulsion forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If large electrodes with macroscopically uniform electromagnetic fields are used, then large scale electroporation and electrofusion of tissue can be achieved, but frictional or abrasive damage occurs and electroadhesive forces are considerably lower than theoretical expectations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectroadhesive forceVSAvoidfrictional or abrasive damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the continuous electrode surface into discrete microstructured elements (pillars, cones, or spherical protrusions) spaced at micrometer intervals. This segmentation creates localized high field gradient regions between adjacent microelements while maintaining overall device functionality, resolving the contradiction by enabling strong electroadhesion without macroscopic frictional contact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates non-uniform local electric field distributions through microstructured electrode geometries, where field strength varies significantly at micrometer scales between adjacent elements. This local quality variation enables high field gradient regions for strong electroadhesion while avoiding uniform macroscopic fields that cause tissue damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 3:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar electrode surfaces to three-dimensional microstructured surfaces with vertical protrusions. This dimensional change creates additional field gradient pathways in the vertical dimension, generating localized high field regions that enhance electroadhesive forces without requiring increased macroscopic field strength that would cause damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Force

If microstructured surfaces are used to enhance electroadhesion, then adhesive forces can be improved, but theoretical models lack optimization guidance for microscopic scale electroadhesive forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectroadhesive forceVSAvoidmicrostructure geometric control
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent provides specific quantitative parameter ranges for microstructure geometry (protrusion height 1-100 micrometers, spacing 1-50 micrometers, radius 0.1-10 micrometers) and operating conditions (field gradient 10^6-10^9 V/m², voltage 1-1000V, frequency 1Hz-1MHz). These parameter specifications enable manufacturing precision while optimizing electroadhesive forces through controlled geometric variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical contact-based adhesion theories with electromagnetic field-based electroadhesion models. By substituting mechanical field theories with Maxwell's equations and dielectric polarization models, the patent provides theoretical optimization guidance for microscopic scale electroadhesive forces without relying on incomplete mechanical analogies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If hierarchically structured inhomogeneity is used, then prehension force can be enhanced above theoretical expectation, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprehension forceVSAvoidmicrostructure hierarchy
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements hierarchical microstructures where smaller geometric features (radius 0.1-10 micrometers) are nested upon larger features (height 1-100 micrometers, spacing 1-50 micrometers), creating multi-scale inhomogeneity. This nesting arrangement enhances prehension force through cumulative dielectric polarization effects while maintaining manufacturability through systematic geometric progression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite electrode structures combining conductive materials (gold, platinum, aluminum, copper) with dielectric coatings (silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, titanium dioxide) in layered configurations. This composite approach enables simultaneous optimization of electrical conductivity, field gradient distribution, and mechanical stability, enhancing prehension force while managing device complexity through material functionality integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These devices provide strong, reversible adhesion to both conductive and non-conductive surfaces without causing damage, enabling applications such as tissue manipulation and fluid separation, while optimizing adhesive forces through geometric control of electroadhesive interactions.

Implementation Method 1

charging the electrode provides a local charge and generates an electroadhesive state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroadhesion: Electrostatic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the forces actually generated are considerably lower than those calculated from theory. This departure from theory is due to the fact that no real substance is a perfectly homogeneous dielectric

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric polarization: Dielectric

Implementation Method 3

surfaces can undergo modification of the surface's wetting properties with an applied electric field, which is known as electrowetting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrowetting: Electrowetting

Implementation Method 4

the use of hierarchically microstructured surfaces which may significantly improve dielectric contact both through localized electric forces (high field gradient) and the formation of composite hydrophilic/hydrophobic domains known as Wenzel-Cassie interfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWenzel-Cassie interfaces: Wetting

Data Source

PatentEP4128516B1Microstructured devices for generating electroadhesion
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 BVW INVEST AG
  • EP4128516B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4128516B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4128516B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A microstructured device (200) is disclosed utilizing Coulomb field modification of surface energy and electroadhesion to localize a device surface or to levitate a device surface with respect to a target surface. The surface energy modification can be permanent or reversible depending on whether the charge is externally delivered to the device or derived on the device galvanically. The microstructure aspect of the device induces various hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions with the target surface. The Coulomb field can be used to enhance or decrease the hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions. In combination, the disclosed electro-microstructured device provides for localizing implants in a mammalian body, and additionally means for controlling cell interaction with the implant.