Microstructured Implant Surfaces for Spinal Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal implants with random and irregular surface patterns face challenges in achieving consistent and efficient bone integration, leading to instability and potential complications due to variable bone growth patterns and directional loading issues.

Innovation Solution

A spinal implant with a defined, repeating three-dimensional surface pattern featuring overlapping two-dimensional patterns of varying depths, designed to promote bone growth and integration by creating a uniform bioactive micromorphology that enhances stability and long-term function.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If random and irregular surface patterns are used on implants, then manufacturing is simpler and easier, but bone integration consistency and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface pattern manufacturingVSAvoidbone integration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the surface pattern from random/irregular to controlled parameters including specific feature sizes (10-100 micrometers), defined geometries (dimples, grooves, ridges), and regulated spacing (5-50 micrometers). This parameter control enables repeatable manufacturing while ensuring consistent bone integration and osseointegration across all implants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The surface is segmented into multiple distinct feature types (dimples, grooves, ridges, peaks) with specific functions. Each feature type addresses different aspects of bone interaction: dimples for initial attachment, grooves for bone in-growth channels, and ridges for mechanical interlocking. This segmentation allows systematic optimization of each feature while maintaining overall manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If deep surface features are created to enhance bone in-growth, then bone integration improves, but stresses between bone and implant increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone integrationVSAvoidstress at osseous interface
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes feature depth parameters to balance bone integration with stress reduction. Feature depths are controlled at 5-50 micrometers, with overall surface roughness Ra of 1-10 micrometers. This controlled depth range provides sufficient bone in-growth while avoiding excessive stress concentration that would occur with deeper features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Different surface features are assigned different depths and geometries based on their local function. Dimples have moderate depths for initial attachment, grooves have varying depths to guide bone in-growth, and ridges have optimized heights for mechanical support. This local quality differentiation allows each feature to perform its function optimally without creating excessive stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If irregular surface patterns are used to accommodate organic bone growth, then initial bone adherence is achieved, but long-term stability and load resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial bone adherenceVSAvoidlong-term load resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The surface is segmented into multiple feature types that work together sequentially: dimples (10-50 micrometers) provide initial bone adherence through increased surface area and micro-shielding effects; grooves (5-20 micrometers wide) guide organized bone in-growth; and ridges provide long-term mechanical interlocking and load distribution. This segmented approach addresses both initial adherence and long-term strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional random patterns to three-dimensional structured features with controlled depths, volumes, and spatial relationships. The features extend 5-50 micrometers into the implant surface, creating a volumetric interaction zone that enhances both initial adherence through surface area increase and long-term strength through mechanical interlocking of bone with the three-dimensional feature structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4129240A1Microstructured implant surfaces
Publication Date: 2023.02.08 TITAN SPINE INC
  • EP4129240A1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4129240A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3B
  • EP4129240A1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4D

AI summary

An implantable device for treating disc degenerative disease and arthritis of the spine. The implant is sized for placement into an intravertebral disc space. The implant has a body with a predetermined, defined, repeating, three-dimensional pattern at least partially on at least one of its surfaces. The pattern is adapted to create a surface area of bone-contacting features that enhance in-growth and biological attachment to a biocompatible material. Also disclosed are process steps for making the implant.