Microsystem Thermal Actuation for Contactless Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In microsystems, there is a challenge in inducing and controlling forces between moving elements without mechanical or electrical contact, particularly in generating repulsive forces on a micrometer scale.

Innovation Solution

A microsystem design where thermal forces are induced by heating or cooling one element relative to another, allowing for repulsive or attractive forces to be generated without mechanical or electrical contact, using standard microfabrication techniques and thermal actuators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If electrostatic force is used to actuate the movable element, then the movable element can be actuated, but mechanical/electrical contact to a voltage source is required and only attractive force can be generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidcontact requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electrostatic actuation (which requires mechanical/electrical contact) with thermal actuation using a microheater. The heater generates repulsive forces through thermal expansion or air heating without requiring contact with the movable element, thus eliminating the contact requirement while still providing actuation force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the actuation mechanism from electrostatic (attractive only) to thermal (can generate repulsive force). By controlling the temperature of the stationary element relative to the movable element, repulsive forces can be generated without requiring mechanical contact, resolving both the contact requirement and force direction limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If magnetic force is used to actuate the movable element, then the movable element can be actuated, but mechanical/electrical contact or magnetic particle is required and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces magnetic actuation (requiring coils, magnetic particles, or contact) with thermal actuation using a microheater. This substitution eliminates the need for magnetic components and their associated complexity while still providing contactless actuation force through thermal effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If mechanical coupling to a piezo actuator is used, then the movable element can be actuated, but mechanical contact is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidcontact requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical coupling (requiring physical contact) with thermal field interaction. The microheater generates thermal energy that creates repulsive forces on the movable element without mechanical contact, eliminating the contact requirement while maintaining actuation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If thermal forces are used to position the movable element, then repulsive or attractive forces can be generated without contact, but temperature control is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontactless actuationVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses temperature as a controllable parameter to generate both attractive and repulsive forces. By adjusting the temperature difference between the stationary element and movable element, the system can switch between attraction and repulsion modes, providing versatile contactless actuation with controlled power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables simple, power-efficient positioning of movable elements with fast response times, independent of absolute temperature and pressure, and allows for precise control of distance between elements, with experimental data showing response times below 10 microseconds.

Implementation Method 1

A difficult problem of microsystems is inducing and controlling forces. In particular, it is desired to reduce friction forces between two elements of a microsystem moving with respect to each other.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

Knudsen forces on microcantilvers, A. Passian et al., Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 92, Number 10, pages 6326-6333, 15 Nov. 2002, and Thermal Transpiration at the Microscale: A Crookes Cantilever, A. Passian et al., Physical Review Letters, Volume 90, Number 12, 28 Mar. 2003

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal transpiration: Transpiration

Data Source

PatentUS7906887B2Microsystem and method for positioning a second element with respect to a first element in a microsystem
Publication Date: 2011.03.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US7906887B2 patent drawing
  • US7906887B2 patent drawing
  • US7906887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microsystem, comprising a first static element (1), a second, movable and unattached element (2), an actuator (3) for effecting a force between the first and the second element (1, 2), which actuator (3) is designed for controlling a temperature (T1, T2) of one of the first element (1) and the second element (2). A corresponding method for positioning a second element (2) with respect to a first element (1) in a microsystem is introduced.