Microtiter Plate Clamping Platform With Spring Tolerance Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing clamping platforms for microtiter plates in mechanical shakers require manual release and fastening, and cannot reliably accommodate dimensional tolerances of microtiter plates, necessitating automation and uniform clamping force across varying dimensions.

Innovation Solution

A clamping platform with pairs of mounts featuring guided clamping jaws, adjustable by a linear drive and compression springs, allowing for tolerance compensation and automated release and fastening of microtiter plates, with stops to prevent movement during shaking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual release and fastening mechanisms are used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and automation capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical complexityVSAvoidautomation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping platform is divided into multiple independent clamping units, each capable of automated operation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high automation capability through modular design while keeping individual unit complexity manageable. Each unit can be controlled independently by automation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping mechanism incorporates self-adjusting features where the system automatically compensates for dimensional variations in microtiter plates through spring-loaded adjustment mechanisms. This self-service capability enables automated operation without requiring complex external adjustment systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If fixed clamping dimensions are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but adaptability to dimensional tolerances deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping dimension accuracyVSAvoidtolerance accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping platform employs dynamically adjustable clamping dimensions through spring-loaded mechanisms that can adapt to variations in microtiter plate dimensions. The springs allow the clamping units to self-adjust within tolerance ranges while maintaining precise clamping force, thereby achieving both manufacturing precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the clamping parameters (force and position) automatically based on the detected dimensions of the microtiter plate. By varying these parameters within certain ranges, the system accommodates dimensional tolerances while maintaining secure clamping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If multiple drives are used for automated clamping, then automation capability is improved, but device complexity and installation space increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated operation capabilityVSAvoidnumber of drives
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple clamping units are merged into a coordinated system where a single drive mechanism can actuate multiple clamping elements simultaneously through mechanical linkages. This merging approach maintains high automation capability while reducing the total number of independent drives required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The drive system is designed with multi-functionality where a single drive unit can serve multiple clamping positions through a cam mechanism or linkage system. This universal drive approach reduces the number of drives needed while maintaining full automation capability across all clamping units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Force

If heavy clamping mechanisms are used, then clamping force is improved, but shaken weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping forceVSAvoidshaken weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces heavy mechanical clamping mechanisms with spring-based elastic clamping elements that provide sufficient clamping force with minimal weight. The spring mechanisms generate the required force through elastic deformation rather than heavy mechanical components, thereby reducing shaken weight while maintaining adequate clamping force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables automated, reliable, and uniform clamping of microtiter plates with minimal mechanical complexity and weight, accommodating dimensional variations and ensuring secure holding during shaking.

Implementation Method 1

a compression spring (7) arranged between the two clamping jaws (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

An entrainer (9) can be moved to and fro by a linear drive (10) between the two mounts (3) of the pair (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12544725B2Clamping platform for a mechanical shaker
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 ADOLF KUHNER
  • US12544725B2 patent drawing
  • US12544725B2 patent drawing
  • US12544725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A clamping platform for a mechanical shaker, which allows automated release and fastening of microtiter plates that are subject to tolerances, includes at least two mounts arranged pairwise for the releasable fastening of the microtiter plates. The platform includes clamping jaws, on which a compression spring acts, actuatable with a link control having a linear drive. In conjunction with the compression spring, the geometry of the guide links allows compensation for the dimensional tolerances of the microtiter plates that are to be fixed by clamping. The spring force of the compression spring is determined such that the clamping jaws that are loaded by the compression spring exert the required clamping force in the deployed position onto the microtiter plates to be fixed.