Microvesicle Extraction by Electrostatic Aggregation and Filtration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for isolating microvesicles, such as ultracentrifugation, size exclusion, immunoaffinity isolation, and polymeric methods, face challenges including low yield, high cost, long processing times, and low purity, making them unsuitable for practical applications, especially in molecular diagnostics.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a polyvalent cationic substance to aggregate microvesicles via electrical force, followed by capture through a filter and separation using an elution solution, eliminating the need for centrifugation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ultracentrifugation isolation method is used, then reliability of microvesicle isolation is improved, but productivity is worsened due to long processing time and low yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical ultracentrifugation system with a chemical aggregation system using polyvalent cationic substances. Instead of using high-speed rotation to separate microvesicles, the invention uses electrostatic interactions between cationic polymers and anionic microvesicle surfaces to form aggregates that can be easily filtered, thereby eliminating the need for expensive ultracentrifuges and reducing processing time while maintaining isolation reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical-chemical parameters of the isolation process by adjusting the charge interactions between microvesicles and polymers. By controlling the charge density, polymer concentration, and ionic strength, the method transforms microvesicles from a state requiring mechanical separation to a state amenable to simple filtration, significantly improving productivity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If ultracentrifugation isolation method is used, then isolation reliability is improved, but loss of time is worsened due to processing time of 8 hours or more

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary chemical action by pre-aggregating microvesicles with polyvalent cationic substances before filtration. This preliminary aggregation step transforms the microvesicles into larger, filterable structures, eliminating the need for time-consuming ultracentrifugation and reducing the overall processing time from 8 hours to a much shorter duration while maintaining isolation reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If size exclusion method is used, then manufacturing precision of microvesicle isolation is improved, but loss of substance is worsened due to microvesicles sticking to filter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation purityVSAvoidmicrovesicle yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces polyvalent cationic substances as intermediaries that bind to microvesicles and prevent their adhesion to the filter surface. These cationic polymers act as protective mediators, allowing microvesicles to pass through the filter without sticking, thereby recovering nearly all microvesicles while still achieving effective separation of impurities, thus improving both yield and purity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If immunoaffinity isolation method is used, then manufacturing precision of specific microvesicle isolation is improved, but loss of time is worsened due to long antibody production process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation selectivityVSAvoidantibody production time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs polyvalent cationic substances that serve as universal reagents capable of binding to all anionic microvesicles regardless of their specific origin or surface markers. This universal approach eliminates the need for time-consuming antibody production while still achieving effective isolation, making the method broadly applicable to various microvesicle types without sacrificing selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Productivity

If polymeric method using PEG is used, then productivity of microvesicle sedimentation is improved, but manufacturing precision is worsened due to co-precipitation of impurities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesedimentation efficiencyVSAvoidsediment purity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality differentiation by using polyvalent cationic substances that selectively interact with anionic microvesicles through electrostatic forces, while leaving other impurities unaffected. This selective interaction ensures that only microvesicles are aggregated and precipitated, while proteins and other contaminants remain in solution, thereby achieving both high productivity and high purity without co-precipitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances microvesicle yield and purity while reducing processing time and cost, facilitating their use in molecular diagnostics.

Implementation Method 1

adding a polyvalent cationic substance to the biological sample to form an aggregate in which the microvesicles and the polyvalent cationic substance are aggregated with other via an electrical force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

passing the biological sample containing the aggregate through a capture filter while the aggregate is captured by the capture filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

passing an elution solution through the capture filter where the aggregate is captured such that the microvesicles are separated from the aggregate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical interaction:

Data Source

PatentUS12551828B2Method for extracting microvesicles from biological sample
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 KOREA UNIV RES & BUSINESS FOUND
  • US12551828B2 patent drawing
  • US12551828B2 patent drawing
  • US12551828B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for extracting microvesicles from a biological sample, the method comprising the steps of: adding a polyvalent cationic material to the biological sample to form an aggregate in which the microvesicles and the polyvalent cationic material are aggregated by electrical force; capturing the aggregate by a capture filter while the biological sample including the aggregate passes through the capture filter; and extracting the microvesicles by allowing an elution solution to pass through the capture filter with the aggregate captured therein to isolate the microvesicles from the aggregate. Accordingly, microvesicles may be extracted using a polyvalent cationic material, without a centrifugation process.