Pressure Stepped Microwave Digestion Venting Cap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microwave digestion systems lack precise control over pressure release and are limited by the size of the vessels, which can lead to safety risks and inefficiencies, particularly when using nitric acid at elevated temperatures and pressures.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for stepwise opening and closing a pressure-resistant vessel at designated pressure set points to release excess gases, allowing for controlled pressure management during microwave-assisted high-temperature reactions, using a flexible cap and pressure sensor to maintain precise control and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of stationary object

If larger vessels are used to contain gases generated during digestion, then the gas-containing capacity is increased, but the total force on vessel walls increases leading to higher safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel volumeVSAvoidsafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The digestion process is divided into multiple stages with periodic pressure releases. The vessel operates in cycles, releasing pressure at designated set points rather than containing all gases simultaneously. This segmentation of the pressure containment process allows using smaller vessels while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic pressure release cycles where the vessel is opened at designated pressure set points during the digestion process. This periodic action prevents continuous high-pressure accumulation, enabling the use of smaller vessels with reduced total force on walls while still achieving complete digestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If pressure release systems are added to control pressure, then safety is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure control system operates automatically based on pre-programmed pressure set points. The system self-regulates by opening and closing the vessel at designated pressure levels without requiring complex manual intervention or sophisticated control mechanisms. This self-service approach improves safety while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls pressure by changing the operational parameter of pressure itself through periodic releases at designated set points. Rather than adding complex mechanical pressure regulation devices, the system manages pressure through controlled venting cycles, simplifying the overall system while improving pressure control safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the vessel is opened frequently to release pressure, then pressure control is improved, but the reaction temperature may drop requiring repeated heating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidheating time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The microwave heating continues uninterrupted during the pressure release process. The vessel is opened for pressure release and then immediately resealed, allowing the microwave heating to maintain continuous action without stopping. This ensures temperature is maintained while still achieving pressure control through periodic venting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure release operation is performed quickly as a brief interruption in the otherwise continuous heating process. The vessel is opened just long enough to release excess pressure and then immediately closed, minimizing the time lost and allowing the reaction to rapidly return to optimal temperature without significant cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Reliability

If smaller vessels are used to reduce safety risks, then the total force on walls is reduced, but the gas-containing capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety riskVSAvoidvessel volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically manages pressure through periodic releases rather than statically containing all pressure throughout the digestion process. This dynamic approach allows the use of smaller vessels that would otherwise be insufficient for containing total gas volume, as pressure is actively managed through controlled venting cycles at designated set points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables smaller, safer vessels with controlled pressure release, reducing the risk of catastrophic failure and improving reaction efficiency by maintaining high temperatures without stopping the microwave application, while preventing aerosol formation and minimizing contamination.

Implementation Method 1

Microwave systems are often used to accelerate the digestion process. Microwaves typically interact directly with the digestion acid and sometimes with the sample composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric heating: Dielectric Heating

Implementation Method 2

measuring the pressure generated inside the vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Data Source

PatentUS10527530B2Pressure stepped microwave assisted digestion
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 CEM CORP
  • US10527530B2 patent drawing
  • US10527530B2 patent drawing
  • US10527530B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A venting cap is disclosed for pressure vessels for microwave-assisted chemistry. The venting cap includes a flexible circular cover for closing the mouth of a reaction vessel, a flexible annular wall depending from the circular cover, and a flexible annular ring at the bottom of the annular wall and parallel to the circular cover for positioning the cap on a reaction vessel. At least one indentation in the circular cover minimizes distortion when any contents of a reaction vessel exert pressure against the cap, and at least one opening in the annular wall provides a ventilation path through the cap when gas pressure in a reaction vessel flexes the cap sufficiently to partially disengage at least a portion of the cap from the mouth of the reaction vessel.