Microwave Plasma Applicator Layout for Constricted Gas Coupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor manufacturing, remote plasma sources with traditional applicator configurations suffer from sub-optimal power transfer, leading to inefficient plasma generation, especially when microwave power is coupled to gas through a single surface, resulting in reduced plasma formation efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The remote plasma source architecture is enhanced by positioning the microwave applicator to constrict the gas flow path, allowing the gas to pass through small gaps between the applicator and the housing, thereby exposing it to a higher electromagnetic field for improved plasma generation, and incorporating a dielectric liner to reduce electron escape and enhance plasma efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If microwave power is coupled to gas through a single surface in traditional applicator configurations, then the device complexity is reduced, but plasma generation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma generation efficiencyVSAvoidapplicator configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from single-surface microwave coupling to multi-surface coupling by positioning the applicator to constrain gas flow through small gaps, exposing gas to electromagnetic fields from multiple surfaces simultaneously. This dimensional change in power coupling geometry dramatically improves plasma generation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The applicator is segmented into multiple surfaces that independently couple microwave power to the gas. Each surface segment contributes to plasma generation in the constricted flow regions, allowing distributed power transfer that enhances overall efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the plasma is moved away from the substrate surface using a remote plasma source, then substrate damage is reduced, but plasma generation efficiency deteriorates due to sub-optimal power transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate damageVSAvoidplasma generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-surface microwave coupling in the remote plasma source, where the applicator constrains gas flow through small gaps and exposes it to electromagnetic fields from multiple surfaces. This resolves the efficiency problem inherent in remote configurations while maintaining the substrate protection benefit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional plasma generation methods are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but the ability to generate plasma at low pressures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure range compatibilityVSAvoidplasma source configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electromagnetic field coupling parameters by implementing multi-surface exposure through constricted flow paths. This parameter change enables efficient plasma generation across a broader pressure range, including low pressures where conventional single-surface methods fail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly improves plasma generation efficiency, enabling the creation of high-efficiency plasmas, such as pure hydrogen plasma at low pressures, which are not compatible with conventional methods, and reduces substrate damage by maintaining the plasma away from the processing chamber surface.

Implementation Method 1

the applicator comprises a dielectric body, and a pin inserted in a hole in the dielectric body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrowave radiation: Microwave Radiation

Implementation Method 2

exposing it to a higher electromagnetic field for improved plasma generation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field interaction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the applicator comprises a dielectric body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric properties: Dielectric

Implementation Method 4

positioning the microwave applicator to constrict the gas flow path, allowing the gas to pass through small gaps between the applicator and the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow constriction: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 5

The plasma is struck in the antechamber and excited gas molecules flow out an exhaust that couples the antechamber to the main processing chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma generation: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS20240379329A1High efficiency microwave plasma applicator
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US20240379329A1 patent drawing
  • US20240379329A1 patent drawing
  • US20240379329A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosed herein include a remote plasma source. In an embodiment, the remote plasma source comprises a housing where a fluidic channel passes from a first end to a second end of the housing. In an embodiment, an applicator intersects the fluidic channel. In an embodiment, the applicator comprises a dielectric body, and a pin inserted in a hole in the dielectric body.