Bidirectional Edge Highlighting for Mid-Level Edge Emphasis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing edge detection methods produce unsatisfactory binary outputs, overemphasizing strong edges and failing to enhance mid-level edges, and often result in suboptimal highlighting due to unidirectional and content-ignorant approaches, leading to grainy images and loss of detail.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates edge intensity using gradient operators, applies a transformation to emphasize mid-level edges and deemphasize strong edges, and employs bidirectional highlighting based on image content to create an edge-highlighted image, ensuring that mid-level edges are enhanced and strong edges are muted, with highlighting adjusted according to the image's brightness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If uniform edge enhancement is applied to all edges, then edge visibility is improved, but noise is amplified and image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge visibilityVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different enhancement strategies to different edge types based on their local characteristics. Strong edges are suppressed, mid-level edges are enhanced, and weak edges are preserved without enhancement. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by applying enhancement only where needed (mid-level edges) rather than uniformly across all edges, thus improving edge visibility without amplifying noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the edge strength distribution by applying a nonlinear transformation function that maps original edge strengths to enhanced edge strengths. This parameter transformation selectively amplifies mid-level edges while compressing strong edges and preserving weak edges, thereby improving overall edge visibility without uniform noise amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If strong edges are highlighted more than mid-level edges, then prominent edges are more visible, but mid-level edges containing interesting information are underemphasized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge prominenceVSAvoidmid-level edge information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a nonlinear transformation function to the edge strength values that inverts the traditional highlighting approach. Instead of linearly increasing highlight intensity with edge strength, the transformation function peaks at mid-level edge strengths and decreases for both stronger and weaker edges. This parameter transformation ensures mid-level edges containing interesting information are emphasized most, while strong edges are deemphasized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If unidirectional edge highlighting is applied, then implementation is simple, but highlighting is suboptimal in images containing both light and dark regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidhighlighting effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements bidirectional edge highlighting that adapts to local image content. For edges in bright regions, dark highlighting is applied, and for edges in dark regions, bright highlighting is applied. This inversion strategy based on local luminance context resolves the contradiction by making the highlighting effective across both light and dark regions, rather than using a single unidirectional approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent determines highlighting direction (bright or dark) based on the local luminance characteristics of each edge region. This local adaptation allows the system to automatically choose the appropriate highlighting polarity for each edge, improving highlighting effectiveness across diverse image regions without requiring complex global decision circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If complicated decision circuitry is used to classify edges, then edge highlighting can be optimized, but system complexity increases and strong edges may be misclassified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge classification accuracyVSAvoiddecision circuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex decision circuitry with a continuous nonlinear transformation function applied to edge strength values. Instead of discrete classification into categories (straight, angled, light, dark), the system uses a smooth mathematical function that directly maps edge strengths to enhanced strengths, capturing the desired highlighting behavior without requiring complex rules or classifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical decision circuitry with a mathematical transformation approach. The nonlinear function serves as a software-based alternative to hardware classification logic, simplifying the system while maintaining or improving edge highlighting accuracy through continuous rather than discrete processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10096097B2Content-aware bidirectional image edge highlighting
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US10096097B2 patent drawing
  • US10096097B2 patent drawing
  • US10096097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for highlighting edges of interest in an image comprising the following steps: calculating edge intensity of edges in the image using gradient operators; applying a transformation to emphasize mid-level edges and deemphasize strong edges; and if a given transformed edge is greater than a threshold value, highlighting the corresponding edge in an edge-highlighted image.