Mid-Mount Aerial Ladder Layout for Weight-Compliant Reach

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional fire apparatuses, particularly mid-mount and rear-mount aerial fire trucks, face challenges in meeting state vehicle weight regulations due to their high gross vehicle weight, which limits their operational areas and requires configuration modifications to reduce length and weight while maintaining effective aerial ladder reach and capacity.

Innovation Solution

A mid-mount fire apparatus design featuring a tandem rear axle with a gross axle weight rating of no more than 48,000 pounds, an extensible aerial ladder with a horizontal reach of at least 88 feet, and a water tank capacity of up to 300 gallons, optimized to reduce overall length and improve maneuverability without exceeding weight limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If the aerial ladder extensible length is increased to maintain reach capability, then the gross vehicle weight increases, but this exceeds state vehicle weight regulations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerial ladder extensible lengthVSAvoidgross vehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The aerial ladder is divided into multiple telescoping sections that can be extended incrementally. The ladder comprises a base section, intermediate sections, and a fly section that can be extended to achieve the required 88-foot horizontal reach without requiring a single excessively long and heavy ladder structure. This segmentation allows the ladder to achieve necessary length while maintaining manageable weight through progressive extension rather than requiring a fully extended long ladder to be constantly carried.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ladder assembly transitions from a static long structure to a dynamic telescoping system. The ladder sections can be extended and retracted as needed, allowing the vehicle to carry a compact ladder structure that expands to the required 88-foot reach only when needed for firefighting operations. This dynamic configuration reduces the weight and space requirements compared to a permanently extended ladder structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Length of moving object

If the overall vehicle length is reduced to improve maneuverability and drivability, then the space available for equipment storage and aerial ladder mounting is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall vehicle lengthVSAvoidequipment storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The aerial ladder is mounted in a mid-position on the vehicle body rather than extending the overall vehicle length. The ladder mount is positioned above the rear axle area, allowing the ladder to extend laterally and vertically rather than longitudinally. This dimensional repositioning enables the vehicle to maintain a compact 502-inch overall length while still accommodating the 88-foot aerial reach capability through vertical and lateral extension of the ladder structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The telescoping ladder sections are nested within each other when retracted, with the fly section contained within intermediate sections, which are contained within the base section. This nesting arrangement minimizes the space required for ladder storage on the vehicle, allowing the equipment bay to accommodate the folded ladder structure without requiring excessive vehicle length. The nested configuration reduces the stored ladder length to a fraction of its extended 88-foot reach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Weight of moving object

If the tandem rear axle configuration is used to distribute weight and meet regulations, then the vehicle complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegross axle weight distributionVSAvoidaxle configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle uses a tandem rear axle configuration with a gross axle weight rating of no more than 48,000 pounds, distributing the vehicle weight across two rear axles rather than a single axle. This parameter change in the axle configuration allows the vehicle to meet state weight regulations by spreading the load, enabling the use of heavier equipment including the extended aerial ladder while maintaining compliance with road weight limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12122648B2Mid-mount fire apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 OSHKOSH CORPORATION
  • US12122648B2 patent drawing
  • US12122648B2 patent drawing
  • US12122648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mid-mount fire apparatus includes a chassis, a body assembly coupled to the chassis, a front cabin coupled to the chassis forward of the body assembly, a front axle coupled to the chassis, a rear axle coupled to the chassis, and a ladder assembly having a proximal end that is coupled to the chassis rearward of the front cabin and between the front axle and the rear axle. The ladder assembly includes a plurality of ladder sections. The ladder assembly is extensible to a horizontal reach of at least 88 feet. A distal end of the ladder assembly does not extend beyond the rear end of the body assembly when fully retracted.