Mid-PTO Detection System for Front Hitch Implements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Operators of compact utility tractors face inconvenience when trying to operate front-mounted mid-PTO driven implements while reversing, as existing systems require frequent actuation of switches to enable reverse implement options.

Innovation Solution

A detection system using a variable reluctance or Hall effect sensor mounted to a front hitch, connected to an electronic controller, allows mid-PTO driveshaft rotation when the reverse pedal is actuated, eliminating the need for manual switch actuation by detecting a specified frequency signal from the sensor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an interlock circuit is used to prevent mid-PTO operation during reverse, then safety is improved, but operational flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the interlock state based on real-time detection of implement presence. When a front-mounted implement is detected via the sensor, the interlock is automatically overridden, allowing mid-PTO operation during reverse. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the safety system flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor provides feedback to the controller about the presence of a front-mounted implement. This feedback loop enables the controller to automatically adjust the interlock circuit state, allowing reverse operation only when appropriate implements are detected, thus maintaining safety while enabling operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If an override switch is added to allow reverse implement operation, then operational flexibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting the presence of front-mounted implements and autonomously controlling the interlock circuit. This eliminates the need for manual override switches, as the sensor-controller system independently determines when reverse operation is safe, thereby improving operational flexibility without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical override switch is replaced with an electronic sensor-controller system. The variable reluctance or Hall effect sensor detects implement presence, and the controller electronically manages the interlock, substituting mechanical operator intervention with an automated electronic system that reduces overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual switch actuation is required for reverse operation, then safety control is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety controlVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor-controller system provides self-service safety control by automatically detecting implement presence and managing the interlock circuit without requiring operator intervention. This maintains rigorous safety control while dramatically improving ease of operation, as the system handles safety decisions autonomously based on sensor input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor continuously monitors for implement presence in advance, preparing the interlock circuit state before reverse operation is attempted. This preliminary detection and preparation eliminates the need for manual switch actuation at the moment of operation, maintaining safety control while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Simplifies the operation of front-mounted mid-PTO driven implements during reverse tractor operation, ensuring continuous functionality without requiring the operator to manually engage the reverse implement option switch.

Implementation Method 1

A variable reluctance or Hall effect sensor mounted to a front hitch that supports a front-mounted implement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVariable reluctance: Magnetic Reluctance

Implementation Method 2

A variable reluctance or Hall effect sensor mounted to a front hitch that supports a front-mounted implement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8897993B2Detection system for front-mounted mid-PTO driven implements
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 DEERE & CO
  • US8897993B2 patent drawing
  • US8897993B2 patent drawing
  • US8897993B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detection system for front-mounted mid-PTO driven implements includes a sensor positioned adjacent a shaft connected between a mid-PTO driveshaft and a front mounted-implement. A controller may be electrically connected to the sensor, to a fuel pump solenoid, and to a reverse sense switch that indicates to the controller if a reverse pedal is actuated. When the controller receives a signal indicating the reverse pedal is actuated, the controller does not shut off the fuel pump solenoid if the controller also receives pulse signals from the sensor within a specified frequency range based on a desired PTO speed, but shuts off the fuel pump solenoid if the controller does not receive pulse signals from the sensor or receives pulse signals from the sensor outside the specified frequency range.