Incremental Mid-Surface Extraction for CAD Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automatic mid-surface extraction tools often produce inappropriate mid-surfaces due to incorrect face pair identification, leading to increased manual correction efforts and user frustration, as they are either overly complex or unintuitive.

Innovation Solution

An incremental mid-surface workflow that allows for the automatic identification and user-driven modification of face pairs in a CAD model, enabling editing and previewing of face pairs, and extracting mid-surfaces based on dimensions, topological connections, and geometric continuity, with graphical feedback for intuitive user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional automatic mid-surface extraction tools are used, then automation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to incorrect face pair identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic mid-surface extractionVSAvoidmid-surface accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mid-surface extraction process into distinct phases: automatic face pair identification, user review and correction, and final mid-surface generation. This segmentation allows the system to maintain automation benefits while introducing controlled user intervention to ensure accuracy, directly resolving the contradiction between automation extent and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If conventional automatic identification methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inappropriate face pair selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-friendlinessVSAvoidface pair identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system presents automatically identified face pairs to the user for review, allowing users to provide corrective input. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from user corrections and improve subsequent automatic identifications, maintaining ease of operation while enhancing manufacturing precision through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If complex conventional tools requiring user input are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveface pair definition accuracyVSAvoidtool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing automatic face pair identification before user review. This pre-processing step prepares the data in advance, reducing the complexity of user interaction during the review phase. Users only need to review and correct pre-identified face pairs rather than manually creating them from scratch, thereby maintaining manufacturing precision while reducing perceived device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11487911B1Systems and methods for providing incremental mid-surface for computer simulation
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 D&E US PARENT LLC
  • US11487911B1 patent drawing
  • US11487911B1 patent drawing
  • US11487911B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein relate to apparatuses and methods for generating face pair surfaces of a solid, including, but not limited to, identifying at least two face pairs including a first face pair and a second face pair. Each of the first and second face pairs including at least two face pair surfaces, graphically displaying the at least two face pairs, and receiving user input for at least one of (1) merging the first face pair and the second face pair, (2) deleting the first face pair, (3) adding a third face pair, (4) adding an additional surface to one of the at least two face pair surfaces of the first face pair, (5) removing at least one face pair surface of the first face pair, or (6) splitting the second face pair into at least a fourth and a fifth face pair, and determining at least one adjusted face pair based on the user input.