Middleware Type Safety via Target Object Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current web frameworks lack type and compile-time safety for third-party middleware, making it difficult for compilers to confirm whether middleware functions are successfully executed, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors due to generic data types and lack of type validation.

Innovation Solution

A method is proposed where a target object type is defined to hold the results of a middleware function, allowing the middleware to generate a new object based on the processed result, ensuring type-safety and validity confirmation, and enabling the compiler to verify the correctness of the executed middleware at compile-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If third-party middleware implement generic data types, then the middleware can be implemented with flexibility and ease of operation, but the compiler is unable to confirm whether middleware was successfully run or the validity of the code

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemiddleware implementation flexibilityVSAvoidcompile-time safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by defining a target object type that specifies the expected structure and properties of middleware results before the middleware function is executed. This allows the compiler to verify at compile-time whether the middleware produces the correct output type, enabling type safety checks before runtime while maintaining implementation flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary target object type that acts as a mediator between the generic middleware implementation and the specific application requirements. This target object type serves as a contract that defines what the middleware should produce, allowing the compiler to verify compliance without constraining the actual middleware implementation details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If additional functions are added to check whether request and response objects have been altered, then the validity of code can be determined, but the amount of code in the application increases, reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode validity verificationVSAvoidapplication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by making the target object type inherently track its own modification state through type-level information. The target object type includes fields that automatically indicate whether the object has been modified, eliminating the need for separate checking functions. This allows the compiler to verify code validity using the type system itself rather than requiring additional runtime checking code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter level at which validation occurs by moving from runtime parameter checking to compile-time type parameter verification. By encoding validation logic in the target object type definition rather than in runtime functions, the system achieves code validity determination without adding executable checking code to the application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If middleware functions use generic data types, then they can be implemented by third parties with ease of manufacture, but type mismatches cannot be detected until runtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemiddleware development easeVSAvoidtype safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing the target object type definition before middleware implementation. This target type serves as a template that guides third-party developers in implementing middleware with correct types, while still allowing flexibility in implementation details. The compiler can then verify type correctness during compilation rather than waiting for runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the level at which type parameters are enforced by moving type verification from runtime parameter checking to compile-time type checking. This allows third-party middleware developers to maintain implementation flexibility while the compiler ensures type safety through static analysis of the target object type conformances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12093758B2Middleware in web framework
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12093758B2 patent drawing
  • US12093758B2 patent drawing
  • US12093758B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Concepts for middleware in a web framework are presented. One example comprises defining a target object type configured to hold results of a middleware function. A first object for an application is received and a process of the middleware function is performed, using the first object, to generate a process result. Based on the process result, a second object of the target object type is generated, after which the second object is provided to the application.