Running Shoe Midsole Isolation Cavities Arch Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern running shoes face challenges in balancing cushioning, support, and energy return, particularly in controlling overpronation, which increases manufacturing costs and makes them unsuitable for normal running due to excessive firmness in the arch area.

Innovation Solution

A midsole design featuring a single material with a front isolation cavity, side cavity, and rear isolation cavity that allows the recessed arch portion to deform and regain shape, providing support for both normal and pronating feet without specialized equipment, using materials like PEBA, EVA, or TPU.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple materials are combined in the midsole to provide cushioning, support, and energy return, then the performance characteristics are improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemidsole performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of a single material (EVA) by controlling its density and durometer values in different regions of the midsole. The heel area uses higher density (0.30-0.40 g/cm³) and durometer (40-60 Shore A) for cushioning, while the arch area uses lower density (0.20-0.30 g/cm³) and durometer (30-50 Shore A) for support. This parameter variation within a single material system achieves multi-functional performance without the complexity and cost of multi-material construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If firm materials are used in the arch area to control overpronation, then the support function is improved, but the shoe becomes unsuitable for normal foot running

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport functionVSAvoidsuitability for different foot types
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating region-specific material properties within the midsole. The arch area has reduced density (0.20-0.30 g/cm³) and durometer (30-50 Shore A) to provide gentle support that accommodates both normal and pronating feet, while the heel area maintains higher density (0.30-0.40 g/cm³) and durometer (40-60 Shore A) for impact absorption. This localized differentiation allows the single-material midsole to adapt to various foot types without excessive firmness in the arch region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If the midsole is designed with deep cutouts and recessed portions to allow bending and deformation, then the flexibility and energy return are improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy returnVSAvoidmidsole structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the midsole into distinct functional zones through deep cutouts and recessed portions rather than using multiple materials. The heel area, arch area, and forefoot area are separated by isolation cavities and recessed portions that allow independent deformation and energy storage/release cycles. This segmentation achieves the energy return function through geometric division of a single-material structure, avoiding the complexity of multi-material bonding and assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances athletic performance by offering desired cushioning and support for both normal and pronating feet, reducing manufacturing costs and maintaining flexibility, thus addressing the need for a cost-effective solution that functions for various running styles.

Implementation Method 1

The resiliency of the material of the midsole and the cavity surrounding the recessed arch portion allows the recessed arch portion to deform from a concave shape up to a flat profile under external pressure and regain its shape when the external pressure is removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11197513B2Running shoe
Publication Date: 2021.12.14 RINALDI MASSIMO
  • US11197513B2 patent drawing
  • US11197513B2 patent drawing
  • US11197513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A midsole for sports shoes having a front isolation cavity, a side cavity, and a rear isolation cavity partially separating the recessed arch portion of the midsole from the rest of the midsole.