Milling Tool Chip Pocket Texture to Reduce Chip Jamming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing milling tools face issues with chip jamming due to friction in the chip evacuation process, leading to tool breakage and poor surface quality, as chips rub against continuous ridges in the chip pocket, slowing down the chip flow and requiring costly surface finish operations.

Innovation Solution

A tool body with a surface pattern of intersecting first and second grooves, formed using ball-nose milling cutters, reduces friction by minimizing contact area and improving coolant distribution, allowing smooth chip evacuation and reducing the risk of chip jamming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If continuous ridges are provided in the chip pocket wall surface, then chip evacuation structure is formed, but chips rub continuously against the ridges causing increased friction and slowed chip flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip pocket structureVSAvoidchip flow speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous ridge structure is segmented into discontinuous ridges by introducing grooves that intersect the ridges. This segmentation reduces the continuous contact area between chips and ridges, allowing chips to flow more easily through the grooves while still maintaining the structural framework for chip evacuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the chip pocket wall surface are given different properties: ridges provide structural support and evacuation pathways, while grooves provide low-friction zones for chip flow. This local differentiation optimizes both structural integrity and chip evacuation efficiency in different areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If smooth grooves are formed in the chip pocket wall surface, then chip flow is facilitated, but continuous ridges separate the grooves causing chips to rub against them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip flow speedVSAvoidfriction on chips
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The problem is solved by adding a second dimension of grooves that intersect the first dimension of ridges. This creates a two-dimensional network of grooves that effectively breaks up the continuous ridges into segments, providing multiple pathways for chip flow while reducing friction at each contact point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If expensive finishing operations are applied to the chip pocket surface, then surface quality is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The desired surface pattern with grooves and ridges is created during the primary machining operation using ball-nose cutters, rather than applying finishing operations afterward. This preliminary creation of the functional surface pattern eliminates the need for expensive post-machining finishing operations while achieving the required surface quality for optimal chip evacuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The surface pattern enhances chip evacuation efficiency, decreases machining time, and reduces tool wear, leading to cost savings and improved surface finish without the need for expensive finishing operations.

Implementation Method 1

Thanks to the grooves, a reduced contact area is achieved between a chip being evacuated via the chip pocket during machining and the front wall surface of the chip pocket. The friction, and consequently also the risk of chip jamming, are thereby reduced and the chip flows smoothly over the surface pattern.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

Furthermore, since the first and second grooves intersect, during wet machining when coolant/lubricant is applied to the tool and the cutting area via an external arrangement or via internal coolant channels arranged in the tool body, the distribution of coolant/lubricant over the wall surface is improved, such that the chips flow smoothly over the surface pattern.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow distribution:

Data Source

PatentEP3560644B1A tool body and a milling tool
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 SECO TOOLS AB
  • EP3560644B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3560644B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3560644B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A tool body (2) for a milling tool (1), comprising: - a front end (3) and a rear end (4) between which a centre axis (C) and a peripheral envelope surface (5) extend, the tool body (2) being configured to be rotated in a direction of rotation (R) around the centre axis (C), - at least one insert seat (6) configured to support a cutting insert (7), - a chip pocket (8) provided in front of the insert seat in the direction of rotation, delimited by a wall surface (9), wherein a surface pattern comprising a plurality of first grooves (12, 12a-e) and second grooves (13, 13a-e) is formed on at least a portion of the wall surface (9), wherein the second grooves (13, 13a-e) intersect the first grooves (12, 12a-e) and wherein each groove of the first grooves (12) and/or each groove of the second grooves (13) has a concave groove profile (17).