Double-Sided Milling Insert Geometry to Prevent Chip Clamping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional milling tools for shoulder milling often cause damage to radially mounted cutting inserts and workpieces due to chip clamping between the cutting insert and the workpiece, leading to damage of active and inactive cutting edges and the machined surface.

Innovation Solution

The milling tool design minimizes the protrusion of the inactive lower cutting edge by ensuring it does not exceed 0.5 mm beyond the outer border, creating a small gap to prevent chips from clinging and getting stuck, thereby protecting the cutting insert and workpiece, and optimizing tool life and machining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the lower cutting edge protrudes beyond the outer border to ensure complete chip removal, then chip removal efficiency is improved, but chip clamping between the cutting insert and workpiece occurs causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip removal efficiencyVSAvoidchip clamping damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the protrusion distance of the lower cutting edge beyond the outer border to be between 0.01 mm and 0.5 mm. This quantitative parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by finding the optimal value that ensures chip removal while preventing chip clamping damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the lower cutting edge is positioned close to the outer border to prevent chip clamping, then damage prevention is improved, but chip removal capability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidchip removal capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by establishing an optimal parameter range for the lower cutting edge protrusion (0.01 mm to 0.5 mm). This quantitative control ensures that the cutting edge is close enough to prevent chip clamping damage while maintaining sufficient capability for effective chip removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If double-sided cutting inserts are used to increase the number of cutting edges, then insert service life is improved, but the risk of chip clamping affecting both upper and lower edges increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert service lifeVSAvoidchip clamping affecting multiple edges
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the positioning of upper and lower cutting edges relative to the outer border. The lower cutting edge is positioned within 0.5 mm of the outer border while the upper cutting edge maintains its conventional position, creating localized protective geometry that prevents chip clamping on the lower edge while preserving the benefits of double-sided inserts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3167990B1Milling tool
Publication Date: 2021.09.22 SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB
  • EP3167990B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3167990B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3167990B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A milling tool (1) comprising a tool body (101) having a central rotation axis (C), including a front end (101) and a rear end (102) between which an envelope surface (103) extends, wherein at least one insert seat having an outer border (106) delimiting the insert seat from the front end and the envelope surface is provided, and at least one double-sided cutting insert having an upper side, a lower side, an upper cutting edge (204) and a lower cutting edge (214) radially mounted in an insert seat with the lower side abutting a bottom contact surface. An active upper cutting edge (204a) is thereby provided. At least a part of the lower cutting edge neighbouring said outer border and located behind the active upper cutting edge in a direction of rotation does not protrude by more than 0.5 mm with respect to the outer border, and a distance between said part of the lower cutting edge and said outer border is smaller than 0.5 mm in the direction of rotation of the tool body.