Milling Spindle Phase Control for Uniform Surface Finish

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Milling processes often result in irregular linear surface structures due to asynchronous cutting-edge interactions between adjacent toolpaths, leading to uneven surface finishes, especially when spindle position is not accurately coupled with path feed or when path length is not a multiple of tooth feed, causing loss of synchronicity between path parameters and spindle position.

Innovation Solution

Control the rotational speed and phase position of the spindle along the machining path by maintaining a consistent phase position across adjacent paths, either by varying spindle speed or feed rate, to synchronize cutting-edge interactions and improve surface quality, potentially eliminating the need for polishing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If constant spindle speed is used, then machining simplicity is maintained, but surface quality deteriorates due to asynchronous cutting-edge interactions in adjacent toolpaths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining simplicityVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from constant spindle speed to variable spindle speed control. The spindle speed is dynamically adjusted along the machining path to maintain synchronous cutting-edge interactions, thereby improving surface quality while managing the increased control complexity through systematic speed variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spindle speed parameter from a constant value to a variable parameter that is continuously adjusted along the machining path. This parameter change enables synchronization of cutting-edge interactions in adjacent toolpaths, resolving the surface quality issue while maintaining computational feasibility through structured parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If spindle position is not accurately coupled with path feed, then machining flexibility is improved, but surface uniformity deteriorates due to loss of synchronicity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining flexibilityVSAvoidsurface uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the relationship between spindle position and path feed, and adjusting the spindle speed accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that cutting-edge interactions remain synchronous across adjacent toolpaths, achieving surface uniformity while preserving machining flexibility through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts spindle speed based on the coupling between spindle position and path feed parameters. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain synchronicity and surface uniformity while responding to varying machining conditions, effectively resolving the contradiction between flexibility and uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If feed rate variation is applied for rapid traverse and reversal, then machining efficiency is improved, but surface quality deteriorates due to random angular position of spindle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-planning the spindle speed profile to account for feed rate variations during rapid traverse and reversal. The spindle speed is adjusted in advance to maintain synchronous cutting-edge interactions even when feed rate changes, thereby preserving surface quality while allowing efficient machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically coordinates spindle speed adjustments with feed rate variations during rapid traverse and reversal operations. This dynamic coordination ensures that the angular position of the spindle remains synchronized with the toolpath, maintaining surface quality while enabling efficient machining cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11507050B2Milling method
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 EXERON
  • US11507050B2 patent drawing
  • US11507050B2 patent drawing
  • US11507050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for machining a workpiece by means of a milling tool arranged on a rotatable spindle, the spindle being moved relative to the workpiece or the workpiece being moved relative to the spindle along a machining path and, at the same time, the spindle rotating about a spindle axis. In said method, an improvement in the surface quality is achieved by controlling the rotational speed and/or the phase position of the rotation of the spindle along the machining path, the machining path comprising linear parallel tracks and the phase position of the spindle along the machining path being substantially the same on adjacent tracks, the phase position being controlled by varying the rotational speed of the spindle and/or the advancing speed of the spindle relative to the workpiece along the machining path.