Milling System with Sensor-Based Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional milling systems lack automation and control, leading to inefficiencies in material processing, increased manual operation, and potential product loss, while also failing to efficiently manage material flow and reduce downtime.

Innovation Solution

A milling system comprising a hopper feeder, mill, cyclone separator, collection container, vacuum source, and a control system with sensors and a controller that adjusts parameters such as cutting speed, feeding rate, and vacuum pressure to optimize material processing and reduce manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional milling systems are used without automation, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and manufacturing precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem automation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The milling system automatically monitors its own state through sensors (flow rate, temperature, pressure) and self-regulates operation through the controller without requiring manual intervention, achieving autonomous optimization of milling parameters and continuous productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors continuously measure flow rate, temperature, and pressure parameters, feed this data to the controller, which then adjusts milling parameters in real-time to maintain optimal performance, creating a closed-loop control system that enhances productivity while managing complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If manual operation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time and loss of substance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime between processing batchesVSAvoidautomation control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically prepares for the next batch by monitoring material levels and pre-adjusting parameters before the current batch completes, eliminating idle downtime and ensuring continuous operation through proactive scheduling and setup

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system maintains continuous milling operation by seamlessly transitioning between batches without manual interruption, keeping the mill running at optimal parameters throughout and eliminating stop-start cycles that cause time and material loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If no control system is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors continuously monitor flow rate, temperature, and pressure, providing real-time feedback to the controller which adjusts milling parameters to maintain consistent particle size distribution, ensuring high manufacturing precision through automated regulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual control and adjustment mechanisms are replaced with automated electronic sensors and controllers that precisely regulate milling parameters, achieving superior precision through electronic control rather than mechanical adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If automated control is implemented, then productivity and manufacturing precision improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stabilityVSAvoidsensor and controller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensors monitor critical parameters (flow rate, temperature, pressure) and provide continuous feedback to the controller, which automatically adjusts operation to maintain stable, reliable milling processes with consistent product quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves multiple functions including monitoring sensor data, regulating motor speed, controlling vacuum pressure, and managing flow rate, consolidating control complexity into a single multi-functional device that manages all parameters centrally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves efficient material processing with reduced manual operation, minimized downtime, and improved throughput by autonomously controlling the milling process, ensuring consistent product quality and reducing waste.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum source in fluid communication with the collection system and configured to generate a vacuum along the flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

configured to generate a vacuum along the flow path sufficient to transfer the material from the mill to the collection container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20240416358A1Milling system
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 FRITSCH MILLING & SIZING INC
  • US20240416358A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416358A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416358A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A milling system to comminute a material may generally include a hopper feeder system, a cutting mill, a collection system, each in fluid communication to provide a flow path, and a control system. The control system may include a controller operatively connected to at least one sensor to sense the amount of material, if any, along the flow path, and the speed, if any, of the material along the flow path. The control system, in response to signals received from the at least one sensor, may cause at least one of the hopper feeder, cutting mill, and collection system to increase the speed, decrease the speed, or stop the flow of material along at least a portion of the flow path. Methods of making and using the same are also described.