Milling Tool Bevel Coating for Wear and Chipping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Milling tools with wear-resistant coatings face issues of breakouts and chipping, leading to reduced tool life and improper chip flow due to high loads on cutting edges, especially when processing difficult materials at increased cutting speeds.

Innovation Solution

A method involving grinding a chamfer on the rake face of cutting edges with a specific rake angle and width, followed by applying a second wear-resistant layer on the ground chamfer to optimize both abrasive and crater wear resistance, using techniques like PVD and CVD for uniform coating, and optionally using diamond layers for enhanced adhesion and abrasion resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a wear-resistant coating layer is applied to the cutting edges, then abrasive wear protection is improved, but the cutting edges become susceptible to breakouts and chipping under high loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear protectionVSAvoidedge strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge is divided into functionally distinct zones: a chamfer region with wear-resistant coating for protection, and a sharp cutting tip region that remains free of coating for strength and chip flow. This segmentation allows each zone to optimize its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the cutting edge receive different treatments: the chamfer area gets a wear-resistant coating while the cutting tip remains uncoated. This local differentiation ensures that wear protection is applied only where needed, preserving edge strength and chip flow characteristics at the critical cutting point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the cutting edges are sharpened after coating to restore sharpness, then cutting performance is improved, but the coated surface is damaged and requires re-coating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge sharpnessVSAvoidcoating integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The chamfer geometry is pre-formed with the correct angle and dimensions before coating is applied. This preliminary geometric preparation ensures that the coating is only applied to areas where it is needed for wear protection, eliminating the need for post-coating sharpening that would damage the coating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a second wear-resistant layer is applied to complex three-dimensional surfaces, then wear protection is improved, but adhesion and coating quality deteriorate due to internal stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidcoating adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The complex three-dimensional geometry is simplified by removing material to create a flat chamfer surface. This extraction of unnecessary geometric complexity allows the second wear-resistant layer to be applied with proper adhesion and uniform thickness, eliminating coating defects caused by internal stresses on complex surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves a resistant combination of layers that enhances tool life by minimizing wear and chipping, ensuring optimal chip removal and cutting performance even with difficult materials and high removal rates, while preventing excessive edge rounding.

Implementation Method 1

This layer is applied in a known manner by vapor deposition, for example by the PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Vapor Deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

Such a diamond layer is applied by vapor deposition using the CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition) method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapor Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentEP1944110B1Method of processing and machining tools for the machining of workpieces by chip removal
Publication Date: 2012.11.07 FRAISA HLDG

AI summary

The tool is coated with a layer resistant to flank wear. A bevel is then ground on the cutting edges. A second layer is then coated onto the ground bevel, which is resistant to cutting face wear. The ground bevel has cutting rake angle of -5 to -30[deg] and a width less than 5% of the diameter of the tool. The first layer is CrAlN, TiAlN or TiAlCN. It is formed by physical vapor deposition (PVD). The first surface to be coated is roughened, and the layer deposited on it is diamond. The layer is applied using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The second layer is alpha -Al 2O 3, deposited by PVD. The bevel is roughened and the second layer is diamond, deposited on it by CVD. In those locations where the second adherent layer is not required on the first, it is removed by a liquid-jetting process.