Milling Tool Coolant Sleeve for High-Speed Coolant Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Milling tools used in optical lens production face challenges with coolant distribution due to high rotational speeds, leading to reduced tool life and coolant loss, especially when using superhard cutting elements like PCD, which are less effective with traditional coolant delivery methods.

Innovation Solution

A coolant sleeve is designed to remain static relative to the rotating milling tool, with a close proximity and specific labyrinthine structures to minimize coolant loss and ensure effective coolant delivery to cutting elements, utilizing a unique coolant passageway design and obstruction arrangements to counteract centrifugal forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high rotational speeds are used for milling, then productivity increases, but coolant retention at cutting edges deteriorates due to centrifugal forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational speedVSAvoidcoolant retention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coolant delivery system adapts to the dynamic high-speed rotation by using centrifugal compensation features that adjust coolant flow paths and pressure distribution to counteract the outward centrifugal forces, ensuring coolant reaches cutting edges despite rotational speeds up to 35,000 RPM

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters including coolant pressure, flow rate, and delivery timing to compensate for centrifugal effects at different rotational speeds, optimizing coolant retention across the full operating range from low to 35,000 RPM

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If superhard cutting elements like PCD are used, then tool life should improve, but coolant effectiveness deteriorates because superhard materials benefit less from traditional coolant delivery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lifeVSAvoidcoolant effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coolant delivery system provides localized, concentrated coolant application directly at each cutting element's specific location, ensuring that each PCD cutting element receives adequate coolant despite the material's reduced coolant responsiveness, thereby maintaining tool life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The coolant delivery is segmented to provide individualized coolant supply to each cutting element rather than general cooling, with separate coolant channels and obstruction arrangements tailored to specific cutting element positions and loading conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If a static coolant sleeve is positioned close to the rotating tool, then coolant delivery efficiency improves, but unintended coolant loss through the gap worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant delivery efficiencyVSAvoidcoolant loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful centrifugal force that causes coolant loss into a beneficial element by using centrifugal compensation features that leverage the rotation to direct coolant inward toward cutting edges, transforming the outward centrifugal tendency into effective coolant delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

Labyrinthine structures and obstruction arrangements act as intermediaries between the coolant supply and the gap, controlling and directing coolant flow to prevent unintended loss while maintaining efficient delivery to cutting edges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Length of stationary object

If coolant pressure is increased to improve cooling, then coolant reach improves, but coolant loss through gaps worsens due to high rotational speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant reachVSAvoidcoolant loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes coolant pressure parameters in conjunction with centrifugal compensation features, using controlled pressure levels that work synergistically with the rotation to direct coolant to cutting edges without excessive loss through gaps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances coolant reach and retention at the cutting edges, improving tool life and coolant efficiency by directing coolant effectively despite high rotational speeds and reducing unintended coolant loss.

Implementation Method 1

it was conceived to provide a head coolant obstruction arrangement (or 'head labyrinth') to the milling tool which may further reduce unintended loss of coolant through the gap between the sleeve and milling tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

directing the coolant to a desired part of the cutting element (in these embodiments, the desired part being a main cutting edge of the of the cutting element) was ineffective due to centrifugal forces causing the coolant to be redirected away from the desired part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS20230226625A1Milling tool and coolant sleeve therefor
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 ISCAR LTD
  • US20230226625A1 patent drawing
  • US20230226625A1 patent drawing
  • US20230226625A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A milling tool having a shank portion and a head portion extending from the shank portion. A head internal surface of the head portion is formed with a peripherally extending head coolant obstruction arrangement comprising a head ridge which extends in a rearward direction more than an adjacent head portion of the head internal surface located in a radially-inward direction more than the head ridge.