Milling Tool Collision Avoidance via Dynamic Pivot Angles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machining methods for flat surfaces, such as face milling, punching, swarf milling, and multipass milling, face challenges with collision issues, stability, and efficiency, particularly when machining complex or hard-to-reach surfaces, leading to increased costs and reduced surface quality.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a milling tool with a conically convex cutting contour that is laterally inclined against the flat surface, allowing for collision-free machining by using multiple pivot angles to divide the surface into segments, thereby avoiding collisions and achieving high surface quality with reduced operational and production costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If face milling is used to machine flat surfaces, then freely accessible planes can be machined efficiently, but machining of planes impaired by adjacent surfaces is limited or impossible due to tool holder collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidmachinability of constrained surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The flat surface is divided into multiple machining zones based on collision risk assessment. The control unit segments the surface into regions where different tool paths and pivot angles can be applied, allowing efficient machining of accessible areas while avoiding collision-prone zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method dynamically adjusts the pivot angle of the milling tool during machining operations. By continuously optimizing the pivot angle based on real-time collision risk assessment, the system adapts to complex geometries and adjacent surfaces, enabling machining of previously inaccessible planes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the tool extension length is increased to avoid collision with adjacent surfaces, then machining of constrained planes becomes possible, but tool stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to constrained surfacesVSAvoidtool stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of statically increasing tool extension length, the system dynamically optimizes the pivot angle during machining. This dynamic adjustment allows the tool to navigate around adjacent surfaces while maintaining a shorter, more stable extension length, thus preserving tool stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the pivot angle parameter during machining operations to avoid collisions. By optimizing this parameter, the system achieves access to constrained surfaces without compromising tool stability through excessive extension length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If punching is used to machine hard-to-reach planes, then vertical accessibility is improved, but the tool is subject to high dislocation and unstable machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical accessibilityVSAvoidmachining stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes the pivot angle during punching operations to maintain tool stability. By continuously adjusting the angle rather than using fixed vertical alignment, the method reduces tool dislocation and improves machining reliability while maintaining accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If swarf milling is used to machine flat surfaces, then larger step widths can be achieved, but the extension length must correspond to the height of the plane causing collision and stability problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestep widthVSAvoidcollision avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The method dynamically optimizes the pivot angle during swarf milling operations, allowing larger step widths without requiring excessive tool extension length. This dynamic adjustment enables the tool to clear adjacent surfaces while maintaining stability and avoiding collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Manufacturing precision

If multipass milling is used to achieve high surface accuracy, then surface quality is improved, but the number of passes increases leading to longer machining time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface accuracyVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes the pivot angle during each pass to maximize material removal efficiency while maintaining surface accuracy. This reduces the number of passes required compared to conventional multipass milling, thereby decreasing total machining time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The method optimizes machining parameters including pivot angle and step width to achieve high surface accuracy in fewer passes. By changing these parameters dynamically, the system balances surface quality requirements with productivity improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10449610B2Method for machining flat surfaces of a workpiece
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 OPEN MIND TECH
  • US10449610B2 patent drawing
  • US10449610B2 patent drawing
  • US10449610B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for machining flat surfaces (30) of a workpiece (32) using a tool (10), in particular a milling tool, which is moved in a collision-free and laterally inclined manner (α) relative to a flat surface (30) such that a contact point (34) is guided on the flat surface (30). The flat surface (30) is machined using a tool (10) with a cutting contour (18), which has a conically convex design, on one flank (16) of the tool (10) at a pivot angle (ß) parallel to the flat surface (30) in order to prevent a one-sided collision completely by the tool (10) and at at least two different pivot angles (ß, ß′) parallel to the flat surface (30) in order to prevent a two-sided collision by the tool (10), wherein the flat surface (30) is separated into at least two machining segments (44, 44′, 44″), each of which is assigned an individual pivot angle (ß, ß′) of the tool (10) in order to prevent a two-sided collision.