MILP Solver Conflict Resolution via Learning Phase Branch-and-Cut

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mixed integer linear programs (MILPs) are computationally expensive to solve due to their NP-hard nature, and existing branch-and-cut methods can be inefficient, taking significant time to find a solution, especially when dealing with complex problems.

Innovation Solution

A two-phase approach is implemented in a MILP solver, where a learning phase gathers conflict information and reduces the solution space complexity, and an application phase uses this information to efficiently search for an optimal solution, employing a modified branch-and-cut process with thresholds to limit the learning phase and restore the root node for further processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional branch-and-cut methods are used to solve MILPs, then the solver can find optimal solutions, but the computational time and expense are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution optimalityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a learning phase before the main solving process. During this phase, conflict information is gathered and analyzed to identify patterns and constraints that will be useful for the subsequent application phase. This preliminary preparation reduces the computational burden during the actual solution search, directly addressing the contradiction between solution optimality and computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The solving process is segmented into two distinct phases: a learning phase for conflict analysis and information gathering, and an application phase for efficient solution search. This segmentation allows the solver to prepare necessary information in advance and then focus computational resources on finding the optimal solution, thereby reducing overall computational time while maintaining solution optimality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the learning phase branch-and-cut process evaluates many nodes to gather conflict information, then the quality of conflict information improves, but the preprocessing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconflict information qualityVSAvoidpreprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by evaluating a sufficient number of nodes during the learning phase to gather high-quality conflict information, but not all possible nodes. The solver determines when enough conflict information has been collected to effectively guide the application phase, avoiding unnecessary preprocessing time while maintaining reliable conflict information for improved solution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If all nodes are removed and root node is restored after reaching threshold, then the solver can apply learned conflict information more effectively, but the solution process requires restarting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution search efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by periodically restarting the branch-and-cut process after the learning phase. The solver removes evaluated nodes, restores the root node, and reapplies conflict information at intervals during the application phase. This periodic restarting maintains solution search efficiency by continuously leveraging learned conflict information while managing process complexity through structured repetition of the solve cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9524471B2Systems and methods for conflict resolution and stabilizing cut generation in a mixed integer program solver
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US9524471B2 patent drawing
  • US9524471B2 patent drawing
  • US9524471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for conflict resolution and stabilizing cut generation in a mixed integer linear program (MILP) solver are disclosed. One disclosed method includes receiving a mixed integer linear problem (MILP), the MILP having a root node and one or more global bounds; pre-processing the MILP, the MILP being associated with nodes; establishing a first threshold for a learning phase branch-and-cut process; performing, by one or more processors, the learning phase branch-and-cut process for nodes associated with the MILP, wherein performing the learning phase branch-and-cut process includes: evaluating the nodes associated with the MILP, collecting conflict information about the MILP, and determining whether the first threshold has been reached; responsive to reaching the first threshold, removing all of the nodes and restoring a root node of the MILP; and solving, with the one or more processors, the MILP using the restored root node and the collected conflict information.