MIM Cartridge Case Design for Strength, Weight, and Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing small caliber ammunition cartridge cases are complex, costly, and inflexible, leading to high scrap rates and inconsistency, and do not meet all testing requirements, particularly due to the limitations of using traditional materials like brass.

Innovation Solution

The use of Metal Injection Molding (MIM) technology to create cartridge cases from powdered metal or metal alloys, combined with Finite Element Method (FEM) analytics to optimize material selection and design, allowing for the production of cartridge cases with tailored geometries and properties that meet performance and testing requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional materials like brass are used for cartridge cases, then manufacturing experience and availability are good, but production complexity and cost increase, and consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing experienceVSAvoidconsistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from traditional brass to powdered metal alloys suitable for MIM processing. This parameter change enables the use of MIM technology, which produces cartridge cases with superior consistency and tighter tolerances while reducing production complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical forming processes with Metal Injection Molding (MIM) technology. MIM uses injection molding principles to form cartridge cases from powdered metal, eliminating complex multi-step mechanical forming operations and achieving better dimensional consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If MIM process is used to create cartridge cases, then production cost and complexity reduce, but material selection becomes more limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidmaterial selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes composite powdered metal alloys specifically formulated for MIM processing. These alloys combine metal particles with organic binders, enabling the MIM process to work with various metal compositions including steels, stainless steels, and other alloys that were previously difficult to form using traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material state parameter from solid metal ingots to powdered metal form. This parameter change enables MIM processing and expands material selection to include various powdered metal alloys that can be injected and sintered, overcoming the limitation of traditional material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If higher strength materials are used, then cartridge case strength increases, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecartridge case strengthVSAvoidcartridge case weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality optimization by using MIM to create cartridge cases with non-uniform wall thickness and strategic reinforcement in high-stress areas. This allows the use of higher strength materials while minimizing overall weight by concentrating material only where structurally necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite powdered metal alloys with optimized metal-to-binder ratios that provide high strength-to-weight characteristics. The controlled composition of these composites enables achieving high strength while maintaining low density, overcoming the traditional trade-off between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If multi-piece MIM designs are used, then certain design requirements are met, but joint failures occur and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidjoint reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple components into a single integrated MIM-formed cartridge case. By combining what would traditionally be separate parts into one monolithic structure formed by MIM, the patent eliminates joints and interfaces that are prone to failure, thereby improving reliability while maintaining design flexibility through the versatility of the MIM process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces production costs, increases consistency and performance, and enables the use of higher strength materials, such as stainless steel and titanium alloys, while maintaining or improving reliability and safety standards, and allows for the production of lighter weight cases that can withstand various environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

injection molding an initial part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMetal Injection Molding:

Implementation Method 2

at least partially melting the binder material to form a semisolid metal-binder slurry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

thermally debinding the green preform to generate a net-shape component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal debinding:

Implementation Method 4

sintering the net-shape component for densification and to generate the initial part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 5

solution treatment, annealing, tempering, hardening, strengthening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Implementation Method 6

secondary processing such as solution treatment, annealing, tempering, hardening, strengthening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS11465207B2Shell case design utilizing metal injection molding
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US11465207B2 patent drawing
  • US11465207B2 patent drawing
  • US11465207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a cartridge case for various caliber ammunition that consists essentially of a powdered metal and/or powdered metal alloy that is formed into the cartridge case through an injection mold processing. Also disclosed is a method for forming a cartridge case, which may include use of Metal Injection Molding (“MIM”) processes to produce the cartridge case which retains a primer, propellant, and/or a bullet. The method can include metal injection molding an initial part, and also at least one of tapering and trimming the initial part to form the finished cartridge case. Further embodiments can include the use of Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis to develop an optimized MIM design.