Monolithic MIM Test Coupon Structure for Stable Sintering and Flash Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for manufacturing metal-injection-molded (MIM) components face challenges such as feedstock restriction issues during the injection process, which can lead to binder shearing, uneven distribution, and warping of test coupons. Additionally, the long, narrow shape of MIM test coupons makes them prone to damage during mold release and sintering, and they often exhibit undesirable 'flash' that is difficult to remove without risking damage.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic precursor test coupon design that includes a first grip portion, a second grip portion, an intermediate portion, and runners connecting the grip portions. This design provides increased stability and prevents breakage or warping during processing. The MIM apparatus features a mold with specific cavities for the grip and intermediate portions, along with runner cavities that facilitate even feedstock distribution and bypass flow restrictions. A flash-removal tool with a tooth and engagement surface is also used to efficiently remove excess material without damaging the coupon.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If feedstock injection pressure is increased to overcome the restriction in the reduced central cross-sectional area, then the feedstock can be pushed through the restriction, but the binder is sheared away from the feedstock and may flow into spaces between ejector pins and the mold, causing the ejector pins to stick to the mold

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock flow speedVSAvoidejector pin reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mold cavity is divided into multiple sections with separate ejector pins for each section. This segmentation allows independent control of ejection force distribution and prevents binder from causing all ejector pins to stick simultaneously. The segmented design isolates the harmful effect of binder contamination to specific localized areas rather than affecting the entire ejection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A release agent is introduced as an intermediary substance between the binder and the ejector pins/mold surfaces. This release agent prevents the binder from adhering to the ejector pins and mold, eliminating the sticking problem caused by high-pressure feedstock injection. The release agent acts as a mediating layer that allows the high-speed feedstock flow to proceed without compromising ejector pin reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If a long, narrow green part with reduced central cross-sectional area is used, then material property testing can be performed, but the coupon may warp during sintering and is prone to damage during mold release

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property testing accuracyVSAvoidcoupon structural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The green part is designed with increased wall thickness and reinforced structural features before the sintering process. This beforehand cushioning provides mechanical strength to the green state coupon, preventing warping during sintering and damage during mold release. The reinforced structure acts as a protective buffer that maintains dimensional stability throughout the vulnerable green-to-sintered transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric parameters of the green part are modified by increasing wall thickness and adjusting the aspect ratio of the reduced central section. These parameter changes enhance the structural stability of the green coupon, allowing it to withstand the stresses of mold release and sintering while still maintaining the reduced cross-sectional area needed for accurate material property testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional manual techniques are used to remove flash from a long, narrow green part, then flash can be removed, but the coupon is at risk of being damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflash removal qualityVSAvoidcoupon integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Manual mechanical techniques for flash removal are replaced with a specialized tool-based system that applies controlled mechanical action. The tool is designed to engage and remove flash through a mechanism that distributes force evenly across the coupon surface, avoiding concentrated stresses that could damage the long, narrow green part. This substituted mechanical system maintains manufacturing precision while protecting coupon integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If a reduced central cross-sectional area is used in the test coupon, then the coupon can be used for material property testing, but feedstock flow is inhibited and binder distribution becomes uneven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property testing capabilityVSAvoidbinder distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feedstock is prepared with optimized binder characteristics before injection, and the injection process parameters are pre-adjusted to account for the reduced central cross-sectional area. This preliminary action ensures that the binder remains sufficiently fluid and distributable during injection, overcoming the flow inhibition caused by the reduced area. The pre-optimized feedstock formulation and injection parameters enable uniform binder distribution despite the geometric restriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The physical and chemical parameters of the feedstock are modified to improve flow characteristics through the reduced central section. Binder concentration, viscosity, and plasticizer content are adjusted to maintain adequate fluidity during injection. These parameter changes enable the feedstock to navigate the restricted geometry while achieving uniform binder distribution, preserving both the reduced cross-sectional area for testing and the manufacturing precision of binder placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12233469B2Monolithic precursor test coupons for testing material properties of metal-injection-molded components and methods and apparatuses for making such coupons
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 THE BOEING CO
  • US12233469B2 patent drawing
  • US12233469B2 patent drawing
  • US12233469B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of removing flash from a gauge portion of a monolithic precursor test coupon using a flash-removal tool is provided. The flash-removal tool comprises a tool body, extending along a longitudinal tool axis, a tooth, and an engagement surface, spaced apart from the tooth along the longitudinal tool axis. The tooth projects from the tool body in a first direction and comprises a shearing surface, facing in the first direction and located an offset distance away from the longitudinal tool axis in a second direction. The method comprises steps of coupling the engagement surface of the flash-removal tool against a first precursor-coupon end of the monolithic precursor test coupon, orienting the longitudinal tool axis parallel to a longitudinal symmetry axis of the monolithic precursor test coupon, wherein the shearing surface registers longitudinally with the flash, and shearing, using the shearing surface, the flash from the gauge portion.