MIMO Antenna Array Switching for Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Three-Dimensional (3D) MIMO antenna arrays in wireless access nodes generate significant radio interference at neighboring nodes, and loss-of-synchronization events further exacerbate this interference, disrupting the ability to synchronize user devices and affecting network performance.

Innovation Solution

A source wireless access node temporarily disables its 3D MIMO antenna array when simultaneous interference and loss-of-synchronization conditions occur, switching to a Two-Dimensional (2D) MIMO antenna array to mitigate interference, and re-enables the 3D MIMO array when conditions improve.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If 3D MIMO antenna arrays are used to serve user equipment, then spectral efficiency is improved, but radio interference at neighboring nodes increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidradio interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between 3D MIMO and 2D MIMO antenna arrays based on real-time interference conditions and synchronization status. The 3D MIMO array is enabled when spectral efficiency is prioritized and disabled when interference mitigation is needed, making the antenna configuration adaptable rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the MIMO system by switching between different antenna array configurations (3D vs 2D) and different beamforming modes based on detected interference conditions and synchronization status, thereby adjusting the radiation pattern and interference characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If 3D MIMO antenna arrays operate during loss-of-synchronization events, then user data exchange continues, but radio interference at neighboring nodes is exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser data exchange continuityVSAvoidradio interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful 3D MIMO array is temporarily extracted or disabled from the system during loss-of-synchronization events when interference conditions are detected, while the 2D MIMO array continues to provide user data exchange services. This separates the interference-generating component from the data exchange function during problematic periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational state of the 3D MIMO array based on synchronization status and interference detection, switching it off during loss-of-synchronization events and restoring it when conditions improve, thereby adapting to changing system states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-generated harmful factors

If 3D MIMO antenna arrays are disabled to reduce interference, then spectral efficiency decreases, but radio interference at neighboring nodes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradio interferenceVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system periodically monitors interference conditions and synchronization status, and periodically switches between 3D and 2D MIMO modes accordingly. This periodic assessment and switching allows the system to capture spectral efficiency benefits when conditions are favorable while mitigating interference when conditions deteriorate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the antenna array configuration parameter based on detected conditions, switching from 3D to 2D mode to reduce interference, and vice versa to improve spectral efficiency, thereby optimizing the trade-off between these two competing objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-generated harmful factors

If loss-of-synchronization events occur, then the ability to synchronize user devices is lost, but switching to 2D MIMO array can mitigate resulting interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradio interferenceVSAvoidsynchronization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D MIMO array that generates excessive interference during loss-of-synchronization events is temporarily extracted or disabled, while the 2D MIMO array remains active to maintain basic communication functions and reduce overall interference levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10659113B1Multiple input multiple output (MIMO) control in a wireless access node
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10659113B1 patent drawing
  • US10659113B1 patent drawing
  • US10659113B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A source wireless access node serves User Equipment (UEs) over a Three-Dimensional (3D) Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna array and over a Two-Dimensional (2D) MIMO antenna array. The source wireless access node wirelessly exchanges user data with the UEs over the 3D MIMO antenna array. The source wireless access node detects a loss-of-synchronization. The source wireless access node detects an interference condition at neighbor wireless access nodes. When the interference condition at the neighbor wireless access nodes and the loss-of-synchronization at the source wireless access node occur simultaneously, the source wireless access node network disables the 3D MIMO antenna array and wirelessly exchanges additional user data with the UEs over the 2D MIMO antenna array. When the neighbor interference condition or the loss-of-synchronization terminate, the source wireless access node enables and uses the 3D MIMO antenna array.