Multi-User MIMO Beam Pattern Exclusion Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining optimal beam patterns for multiple antennas in transmitting and receiving devices in a multi-user MIMO group is challenging due to lack of coordination supported by existing communication protocols and networking subsystems, leading to interference and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

A transmitting device calculates beam-pattern settings for a set of antennas to ensure receiving devices in a subset are on beams while others are in exclusion zones, reducing interference by intentionally excluding certain devices from communication, thereby improving throughput and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If beamforming techniques are used to improve wireless communication performance, then signal quality and throughput are improved, but device complexity and coordination requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless communication throughputVSAvoidbeam pattern coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the group of receiving devices into two distinct subsets: those located on beams and those located in exclusion zones. This segmentation allows the transmitting device to apply different beam pattern configurations to different subsets, simplifying the coordination problem by breaking it down into manageable groups with distinct handling strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating spatially differentiated beam patterns where different regions (beams vs. exclusion zones) have different signal characteristics. Devices in beam regions receive enhanced signals while devices in exclusion zones experience suppressed signals, allowing localized optimization of communication quality for different device groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If beam patterns are optimized for specific receiving devices, then communication performance with those devices improves, but interference to other devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliability with target devicesVSAvoidsignal interference to other devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of beamforming (which creates directional signal concentration) into a beneficial feature by intentionally designing exclusion zones alongside beams. The same beam-forming mechanism that concentrates signals toward target devices simultaneously creates regions of signal suppression that protect non-target devices from interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-establishing exclusion zones in the beam patterns before transmission occurs. By proactively designing these suppression regions, the system prevents interference to non-target devices before it can occur, rather than attempting to mitigate it afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Productivity

If all receiving devices are included in MIMO communication, then resource utilization improves, but beam pattern optimization becomes infeasible

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMIMO group resource utilizationVSAvoidbeam pattern calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the receiving devices into distinct subsets (beam devices and exclusion zone devices), allowing simplified beam pattern calculations for each subset rather than attempting to optimize for all devices simultaneously. This segmentation makes the beam pattern optimization problem computationally feasible while still utilizing multiple receiving devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing beam optimization efforts only on the subset of devices located on beams, while accepting that devices in exclusion zones will receive suppressed signals. This partial optimization approach achieves practical results without the computational burden of optimizing for all devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10511358B2Beamforming for a multi-user MIMO group
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US10511358B2 patent drawing
  • US10511358B2 patent drawing
  • US10511358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

During wireless communication with a multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) group, a transmitting device may exclude a receiving device from a subset of the multi-user MIMO group to which it communicates data. In particular, based on responses from receiving devices to sounding packets with beamforming information for the receiving devices, the transmitting device calculates beam-pattern settings for a set of antennas so that, when communicating with the subset, receiving devices in the subset are located on beams within beam patterns formed by the set of antennas while a remainder of the receiving devices (including the receiving device) are located at exclusion zones in the beam patterns. Moreover, a beam pattern for a given receiving device in the subset provides a beam at a location of the given receiving device and provides exclusion zones at locations of the other receiving devices in the multi-user MIMO group.