MIMO Broadcast Signal Decoding with PLP Segmentation for Robust Reception

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital broadcast systems face challenges in enhancing data transmission efficiency, maintaining robustness and flexibility, especially in indoor environments and with mobile receiving equipment, while maintaining compatibility with conventional methods.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a MIMO system combined with SVC technologies, which arranges MIMO broadcast signals SVC encoded per PLP or per frame, allows for efficient data transmission and error-free reception even in challenging environments, and maintains compatibility with conventional systems by using MIMO signals in a way that can be processed by single-antenna receivers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If MIMO system is implemented to enhance data transmission efficiency, then data transmission efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The MIMO broadcast signal is segmented into multiple PLPs (Physical Layer Pipes), with different PLPs carrying different layers of service data. This segmentation allows the complex MIMO transmission to be broken down into manageable streams that can be processed independently, reducing the overall system complexity while maintaining high data transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The MIMO broadcast signal is designed to serve multiple functions simultaneously: it provides enhanced data transmission for advanced receivers while maintaining compatibility with conventional single-antenna receivers. The same signal structure supports both MIMO and SISO (Single-Input Single-Output) modes, making the system universal and multi-functional without requiring separate transmission systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If MIMO broadcast signals are transmitted to enhance robustness, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different PLPs within the MIMO broadcast signal are assigned different quality characteristics and error protection levels according to their service requirements. Critical services receive enhanced error correction and more robust modulation, while less critical services use more efficient but less robust transmission parameters. This local differentiation of quality attributes improves overall reliability without uniformly increasing complexity across all data streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If SVC technologies are used to recover services in similar transmission paths, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice recovery capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The SVC (Scalable Video Coding) technology is applied in advance to encode service data into multiple layers with different quality levels and error resilience characteristics. This preliminary encoding allows the receiver to selectively decode appropriate layers based on channel conditions and service requirements, enabling service recovery without requiring complex real-time processing during reception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the decoding and processing of different PLPs based on received signal quality and service priorities. When certain transmission paths experience degradation, the system automatically adjusts which PLPs are decoded and how error correction is applied, providing dynamic service recovery capability without requiring fixed complex processing for all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If MIMO system is implemented to maintain compatibility with conventional systems, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompatibilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The MIMO broadcast signal is designed with universal compatibility by incorporating multiple PLPs that can be independently decoded. Advanced MIMO receivers can utilize all PLPs for enhanced performance, while conventional single-antenna receivers can decode any individual PLP for basic service reception. This multi-functional design ensures backward compatibility without requiring separate transmission infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2911385B1Broadcast signal transmitter and receiver, and broadcast signal transmitting and receiving method
Publication Date: 2020.04.01 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP2911385B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2911385B1 patent drawingFigure 2(A)~2(B)
  • EP2911385B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

According to one embodiment of the present invention, a broadcast signal receiver comprises: a first OFDM demodulator and a second OFDM demodulator which perform OFDM demodulation on a first M*M-QAM-type broadcast signal and on a second M*M-QAM-type broadcast signal, respectively; a first frequency deinterleaver and a second frequency deinterleaver which deinterleave the first OFDM-demodulated broadcast signal and the second OFDM-demodulated broadcast signal, respectively, in a frequency domain; a first frame parser and a second frame parser which parse frame structures of the first deinterleaved broadcast signal and of the second deinterleaved broadcast signal, respectively; a first time deinterleaver and a second time deinterleaver which deinterleave the first frame-parsed broadcast signal and the second frame-parsed broadcast signal, respectively, in a time domain; and a MIMO decoder which performs MIMO decoding on the first time-deinterleaved broadcast signal and on the second time-deinterleaved broadcast signal to output a first M-QAM-type signal and a second M-QAM-type signal.