Unequal Bit Allocation for MIMO Channel State Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO technology, the existing methods for downlink transmission layers use the same modulation coding scheme (MCS), which leads to inefficient transmission performance, particularly for sub-channels with worse signal-to-noise ratios.

Innovation Solution

A method for feedback of channel state information (CSI) is introduced, where a terminal equipment generates and feeds back CSI for multiple layers using unequal numbers of bits, allowing for differentiated feedback precisions for each sub-channel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the same modulation coding scheme (MCS) is used for all downlink transmission layers, then the design satisfies reliable transmission of the sub-channel with the worst signal-to-noise ratio, but the transmission performance of other sub-channels is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliable transmissionVSAvoidtransmission performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allocating different feedback bit lengths to different downlink transmission layers based on their individual channel conditions. Specifically, layers with poorer signal-to-noise ratios are allocated more feedback bits to improve their channel state information precision, while layers with better conditions use fewer bits. This resolves the contradiction by optimizing each layer's transmission performance according to its local channel quality rather than applying a uniform MCS to all layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If unequal numbers of bits are used to indicate channel state information of different layers, then transmission performance of all sub-channels is improved by reinforcing poor channels, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of feedback bit allocation from a uniform value to variable values based on channel conditions. The network device determines different feedback bit lengths for different layers according to their signal-to-noise ratios and channel qualities. This parameter change enables differentiated precision for channel state information feedback, improving overall transmission performance while managing complexity through adaptive rather than fixed differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the channel state information feedback into different bit allocations for different layers. Instead of treating all layers uniformly, the system divides the feedback resources according to layer-specific needs, with poorer layers receiving more bits and better layers receiving fewer bits. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing performance optimization for each layer while maintaining manageable overall system complexity through structured resource division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If differentiated feedback precisions are applied to each sub-channel, then overall system gain is improved, but the device complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem gainVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feedback bit allocation where the number of feedback bits for each layer is adjusted based on real-time channel conditions and signal-to-noise ratios. Rather than using fixed differentiated precision, the system dynamically determines the appropriate feedback precision for each layer, allowing optimal system gain while adapting to changing conditions. This dynamic approach balances performance improvement with processing overhead management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250183968A1METHOD FOR FEEDBACK of CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION, DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 1FINITY INC
  • US20250183968A1 patent drawing
  • US20250183968A1 patent drawing
  • US20250183968A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data transmission method, a method for feedback of channel state information, an apparatus and a system, the data transmission method including: a network device transmits first information to a terminal equipment, the first information indicating the terminal equipment to generate and feedback channel state information; the network device receives channel state information of N layers transmitted by the terminal equipment, wherein N≥2 and channel state information of at least two layers of the channel state information of N layers is indicated by unequal numbers of bits; and the network device transmits data to the terminal equipment according to the channel state information of N layers.