Radio Channel Quality Reporting for MIMO Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quality reporting methods for MIMO systems, particularly in wireless telecommunications, are inadequate for accurately assessing channel hardening and interference nulling, leading to inefficiencies in data transmission and increased overhead due to the averaging of frequency domain variations and smoothing of interference effects.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a method where a UE determines the performance of precoding schemes by analyzing deviations in received data symbols and correlation values, triggering quality reports when thresholds are exceeded, allowing the base station to adjust transmission parameters and reduce uplink overhead, while exploiting channel hardening for simplified resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current quality reporting methods are used in MIMO systems, then channel state information can be obtained, but the reporting overhead increases and measurement precision deteriorates due to frequency domain averaging and interference smoothing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidreporting overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and reports only the essential channel quality information (CQI) that reflects actual data transmission performance, rather than reporting all channel state details. This selective extraction reduces reporting overhead while maintaining measurement precision for the most critical quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of averaging frequency domain variations and smoothing interference effects as in conventional methods, the patent inverts the approach by preserving and reporting the actual variations and interference impacts that affect data transmission quality, thereby improving measurement precision for relevant quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If frequent quality reporting is performed to improve channel quality assessment, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time and productivity decrease due to increased overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel quality assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback-based reporting where the receiver provides channel quality information that enables the transmitter to adapt transmission parameters. This targeted feedback mechanism achieves sufficient measurement precision without requiring excessive reporting frequency, thereby maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reporting parameters to focus on quality metrics that most impact data transmission performance. By reporting only the most relevant quality parameters rather than all channel state parameters, the system achieves adequate measurement precision with reduced reporting overhead, thus maintaining higher productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If detailed channel state information is reported to improve transmission optimization, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases due to processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission parameter adaptationVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential channel quality information needed for transmission adaptation, such as CQI values that directly indicate suitable modulation and coding schemes. This selective extraction provides sufficient adaptability for optimizing transmissions while avoiding the device complexity associated with processing and reporting complete channel state matrices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3411969B1Reporting of radio channel quality
Publication Date: 2021.05.26 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP3411969B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3411969B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3411969B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method implemented in a first radio device (UE) for quality reporting of a radio channel (2) comprising: Determining a condition of the radio channel and entering a monitoring phase if the condition of the radio channel exhibits an invariance of statistics of the radio channel (810, 81 1 ), Receiving at least one data symbol via said radio channel during the monitoring phase (812), Determining a statistical characterization of the radio channel based on the received data symbol (813), and Reporting a quality of the radio channel (2) to a second radio device if the statistical characterization exceeds a predetermined threshold (814).