MIMO Model-Free Control With Channel-Specific Self-Tuning Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MIMO compact-form model-free control methods with same-factor structures struggle to achieve ideal control performance in complex, strongly nonlinear MIMO systems with different characteristics between control channels, limiting their applicability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of MIMO different-factor compact-form model-free control with parameter self-tuning, where each control input uses unique penalty and step-size factors, calculated using a neural network based on error gradients, allowing for adaptive tuning of these parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the same-factor structure is used in MIMO compact-form model-free control, then the implementation is concise and computational burden is low, but the control performance deteriorates in strongly nonlinear MIMO systems with different characteristics between control channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the unified penalty factor λ and step-size factor ρ into channel-specific factors λi and ρi for each control input ui(k). This segmentation allows each control channel to have its own tuning parameters, enabling differentiated control strategies for different control channels while maintaining the overall model-free control framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different penalty factors and step-size factors for different control inputs based on their specific characteristics. Each control channel can have locally optimized parameters (λi, ρi) that match its individual dynamics, improving control accuracy for strongly nonlinear systems with heterogeneous channel characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If different penalty factors and step-size factors are used for different control inputs, then control accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidparameter tuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automatic parameter tuning mechanisms where the system adjusts its own penalty factors λi and step-size factors ρi based on real-time system behavior and performance feedback. This self-adjustment capability eliminates the need for manual tuning of multiple parameters, reducing operational complexity despite the increased number of parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where control performance information is continuously monitored and used to adjust the penalty factors and step-size factors. This closed-loop parameter adaptation allows the system to automatically optimize its parameters based on actual performance, reducing the complexity of parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11733657B2MIMO different-factor compact-form model-free control with parameter self-tuning
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 ZHEJIANG UNIV
  • US11733657B2 patent drawing
  • US11733657B2 patent drawing
  • US11733657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention discloses a MIMO different-factor compact-form model-free control method with parameter self-tuning. In view of the limitations of the existing MIMO compact-form model-free control method with the same-factor structure, namely, at time k, different control inputs in the control input vector can only use the same values of penalty factor and step-size factor, the invention proposes a MIMO compact-form model-free control method with the different-factor structure, namely, at time k, different control inputs in the control input vector can use different values of penalty factors and/or step-size factors, which can solve control problems of strongly nonlinear MIMO systems with different characteristics between control channels widely existing in complex plants. Meanwhile, parameter self-tuning is proposed to effectively address the problem of time-consuming and cost-consuming when tuning the penalty factors and/or step-size factors. Compared with the existing method, the inventive method has higher control accuracy, stronger stability and wider applicability.